Home Site Map Contact Us Join ASA Members Only
 
ASA NEWSLETTER
 
 
May 1996
Volume 60
Number 5
 

The Preoperative Clinic and Perioperative Medicine

Noel W. Lawson, M.D.


The Dean of Medicine and Provost of the University of Missouri granted a change of title to the department of anesthesiology. It became the Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine on December 1, 1995. The purpose for the new designation was to redefine the practice of anesthesiology from that of nonphysicians who administer anesthesia. The anesthesiologist is a physician consultant with special technical skills as a result of longer and more involved training. The transformation of the specialty was publicly acknowledged by the actions of the University of Missouri.

Perception of the anesthesiologist as a perioperative specialist signals the maturation of anesthesiology. Maturity is defined as "perfected by time or natural growth brought by time or natural process to a complete state of development."

The catalyst that hastened the concept of the "perioperative physician" was the "holy grail" of cost-containment. The perioperative period can be divided into three intervals: 1) preoperative, 2) intraoperative, and 3) postoperative. Each interval has its peculiar labor and costs. Anesthesiologists are among the few who have the information and involvement to correlate this triad with patient risk, cost, procedure and outcome.

Surgical services, of which anesthesia has been a font for surgical progress since 1846, typically accounts for 50 percent of a hospital's income. The success of the anesthesiologist and the hospital is inextricably bound together. Economic survival depends upon proper operating room (O.R.) management, which relies upon patient flow through the perioperative period. The anesthesiologist, by training and service, is in a unique position to serve as perioperative manager as well.

Until recently, our role in the preoperative period was poorly defined and sometimes was considered a nuisance by the enthusiastic surgeon. Our burgeoning involvement in the preoperative arena has closed the loop. This issue was forced by the explosive growth of outpatient surgery, day-of-surgery admissions, litigation and denial of payment for presurgical admissions. The traditional "night before" visit by the anesthesiologist was history.

Clearly, the complexities of modern anesthesia obviated the cumbersome practice of clearing patients for surgery by physicians other than anesthesiologists. Third-party payers had shifted the time and cost of the preoperative workup to the anesthesiologist and hospital, and the time cost was injected into expensive prime operating hours. Major economic losses were incurred from delays or cancellations in the schedule when patients were first seen at the moment of surgery. This was unacceptable to our patients. Patients were being placed in peril, and we were losing the competitive edge.

The choice was to lower standards of care or mutate. Anesthesiology and the hospital administration made a leap of faith; we mutated and discovered that Darwinian principles are alive and well - organisms that vary in the direction favored by the environment will survive.

Leon Martel, in Mastering Change, describes three common traps that keep us from recognizing and fostering change: 1) believing that yesterday's solutions will solve today's problems; 2) assuming present trends will continue; and 3) neglecting the opportunities offered by future change.

Preoperative Clinic Offers Balance
The University of Missouri Hospital and Clinics developed a full-service clinic devoted to the preoperative financial, nursing and medical preparation of patients for surgery. The clinic was opened in November 1993. Medical direction is under anesthesiology with nurse supervision provided by the clinic's administration. An anesthesiologist or senior resident is in the clinic full-time.

The clinic is purposefully located within the surgical outpatient clinics and provides precertification, nursing instruction, anesthesiology examination and clearance. Patients can be scheduled for their preoperative visit at their leisure any day before their scheduled surgery or can be seen in the clinic on the same day that a patient and his or her surgeon have decided upon the procedure. Further consultation or laboratory examinations can be obtained when necessary. Choices of anesthesia, consent and postoperative pain management also are discussed.

If a delay were to occur, it would happen in the clinic rather than during surgical time on the day of admission. The clinic is open five days a week from 8 a.m. until 5 p.m. with a goal of closing by 4 p.m. The byword is "patient friendly."

The majority of the clinic's patients (65 percent) have same-day surgery or are admitted on the day of surgery. Until the clinic was opened, the majority of patients were not otherwise available for preoperative examination until arrival in the O.R. This included pediatric patients. The opening of the preoperative clinic produced immediate economic and medical benefits that assuaged many of the critics who viewed this change as further bureaucratic bloat, patient hassle or territorial grab.

Approximately 14,000 patients have been seen since opening day. Fewer than 10 cases have been documented in which surgical delays or cancellations occurred as a result of preoperative, administrative or medical misadventures. The clinic has been enormously popular with patients once they have attended and, unofficially, it has been pronounced "the equivalent of two Prozac tablets." The calming effect of the preoperative visit by the anesthesiologist and nurse was well-established three decades ago but, until recently, was ignored for "expediency."

In fact, the average time spent for a complete visit, including waiting time, is 45 minutes, less if the patient and procedure are low-risk and if no laboratory work is required. That time represents 45 minutes per patient that was added back to prime operating time. This translated into an additional 10 to 20 hours of available surgical time per day that was formerly expended in preoperative assessment. This is the equivalent of adding two operating rooms. The O.R. schedule has accommodated a 12-percent increase in case load for each of the first two years of the clinic's operation without increasing full-time equivalents or overtime.

A savings of $250,000 was recognized in the first year by reducing unnecessary and duplicate laboratory tests. Overall, the hospital appreciated a significant increase in profit, of which 47 percent flowed from the surgical services, between 1994 and 1995. The clinic also has become a source of autonomy and patient flow for the anesthesiology department in referrals for outpatient consultation and inpatient consultation that includes high-risk pregnancies. The preoperative clinic also serves as a source of referral to other services in which consultation and further workup before surgery is appropriate as determined by the surgeon and anesthesiologist. We established a bridgehead as consultant-level physicians.

Grassroots attitudes toward the anesthesiologist by patients and colleagues also have changed noticeably. We are no longer the silent service cloistered in cold, tiled rooms out of sight and mind, awaiting the tides of the schedule. We can commiserate with the surgeons' problems in clinic management and scheduling. Consults and case discussions are taken more seriously. We are a direct influence in hospital management and the operating room.

Patients, too, are being influenced and educated, requesting "the doctor that examined me in the clinic." Some elective cases have been scheduled according to the availability of their selected anesthesiologist. The improved patient perception of us as physicians also is being discovered by residents when patient rapport is established while dressed in appropriate civilian mufti. There is no place for the proletariat fashion of dirty scrubs or rumpled white coats in the preoperative clinic. There is only one chance to make a good first impression.

Economics aside, this author further suggests that, in part, the University of Missouri Dean of Medicine and Provost's enthusiastic support in approving our request to add "perioperative medicine" to our title was related to the performance of the preoperative clinic in the context of hospital management. The Dean is a practicing cardiothoracic surgeon as well as the chief executive officer of the hospital.

This author began training at a time when anesthesiologists were mostly confined to the O.R. Internists cleared the patients for surgery. Surgeons protected their patients from us in the postoperative period. Our medical training and expertise were being underutilized. There are those today who maintain this carbon-dated attitude while ignoring the conspicuous advances made by physicians in the field of anesthesiology in the past three decades.

Technology has helped to release the anesthesiologist from the O.R., but there is no intent to abdicate technical or medical responsibility in the O.R. Progress has directed our conversion from traditionalist to expansionist, for which there remains a minor rift today. We must continue to make discriminating decisions in areas that only we can make as physicians, such as the preoperative clinic, O.R., postanesthesia care unit, intensive care unit or pain clinic.

Drugs and anesthesia techniques are becoming safer, such that we can rely more on technicians in the future to assist in the demand for service while offering perioperative expertise. We must learn to let go and delegate those nonmedical activities that can be done by others at lower cost. This is the heart of the team concept.

However, this expediency will not forsake safety provided that there is physician oversight throughout the perioperative period. The administration of an anesthetic is often the least taxing part of patient care once patients are properly prepared and postoperative problems are anticipated, including pain management. This is the practice of perioperative medicine. The importance of defining our niche is important to our growth.

"The professional and the technician have in common an expertise not possessed by the layman, but the professional has undergone a much longer period of preparation and knows much more than the technician. The professional is capable of applying this knowledge to a great variety of unforeseen problems, while the technician does it in a routine manner and follows the instructions of the professional. Though a clever technician may make small improvements in techniques, fundamental advances in technology are almost without exception, the work of professional people."

-Admiral H.G. Rickover
in Education and Freedom

Perioperative Workshop

The ASA Workshop on Perioperative Assessment and Management will be held at the Marriott Pavilion Hotel in St. Louis, Missouri, on November 16-17, 1996. The program has been designed for practitioners who evaluate and care for surgical patients during the pre-, intra- and postoperative periods.

Sessions will be devoted to preoperative risk assessment, focusing on specific disease entities and selection of appropriate laboratory testing, primarily of noncritical care patients. The impact of value-based anesthesia care on the intraoperative and postanesthesia periods will be discussed. Sessions will also highlight the skills needed for operating room leadership and for the development of administrative and managerial expertise necessary to promote the anesthesiologist's role as a perioperative physician.

Registration forms for this meeting will be mailed in mid-May.

 


return to top Home >Newsletters >May 1996Home >Test


 


FEATURES

ARTICLES


DEPARTMENTS


The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent or reflect the views, policies or actions of the American Society of Anesthesiologists.

NL Archives

Information for Authors