Home Site Map Contact Us Join ASA Members Only
 
ASA NEWSLETTER
 
 
December 2000
Volume 64
Number 12
   
Year 2000 in Review: Highlights of State Legislative and Regulatory Activities

S. Diane Turpin, J.D.


As of this writing, all but a handful of state legislatures have adjourned for the year. While there has been limited legislative activity this year, there has been significant regulatory activity, primarily related to office-based surgery and anesthesia. We expect continued advances in this area in the coming year. Selected activity from the past year is reported in this article.

Office-Based Anesthesia

CA – The California Society of Anesthesiologists supported legislation to redefine the threshold standard for accreditation of outpatient settings and to charge the Medical Board with adopting regulations regarding same. The legislation did not pass this session but is expected to be reintroduced next year.

CT – The Office of Health Care Access has proposed regulations to address office-based surgery. The proposed regulations would require a certificate of need for the office and limit surgery to only elective procedures of less than two hours. The proposed regulations are under review, and additional hearings are scheduled.

DC – The Department of Health adopted the ASA Guidelines for Office-Based Anesthesia as the accepted standard of care for the office setting.

FL – Portions of the proposed rule relating to office-based surgery and anesthesia were adopted and became effective in February 2000. Additional refinements, including anesthesiologist participation in all general anesthetics and major conduction anesthesia (Level III), subsequently were adopted. Implementation of the provisions related to anesthesiologist participation in all Level III procedures has been delayed due to legal challenges. The Board of Medicine recently adopted a three-month moratorium on all Level III procedures in offices due to reporting data that showed 20 adverse incidents in offices within a five-month period. All adverse incidents required transfer of the patient to the hospital; five incidents resulted in the patient's death. The deaths were reportedly anesthesia-related. When the moratorium expired on November 8, the Florida Board of Medicine issued several new rules, including the adoption of the ASA "Standards for Basic Anesthetic Monitoring" in offices and the mandatory, detailed reporting of outcomes for one year (see Component Society News, ).

MD – The Board of Physicians Quality Assurance is developing guidelines for minimal standards of care for patients undergoing office surgeries, types of equipment required and anesthesia standards.

NY – The Department of Health approved Guidelines for Office-Based Surgery and Anesthesia addressing qualifications of practitioners and staff, equipment, facilities and policies and procedures for patient assessment and monitoring.

OK – The Board of Medicine adopted the ASA Guidelines for Office-Based Anesthesia as the accepted standard of care for the office setting.

RI – The Department of Health approved regulations for surgery and anesthesia in the office setting. The regulations require offices to be licensed by January 1, 2001, with accreditation within 24 months thereafter.

TX – Regulations were adopted by both the Board of Medical Examiners and the Board of Nursing regarding office-based anesthesia. The Board of Medical Examiners has proposed additional regulations to clarify registration requirements.

Scope of Practice

MD – Two bills supported by the nurse anesthetists failed: H.B. 622 would have required hospitals to provide staff privileges for nurse anesthetists; H.B. 798 would have required hospitals, as a condition of licensure, to establish a credentialing process for health care practitioners and physicians who were employed by or had staff privileges at the hospital. H.B. 1034/S.B. 328 passed, requiring a study of hospital credentialing processes for nurse anesthetists, nurse midwives and social workers.

MO – Legislation was introduced in the House and Senate to allow nurse anesthetists to prescribe and administer drugs and devices, including controlled substances, within the perioperative setting period. The bills would have allowed a nurse anesthetist to cause drugs and devices to be administered by a nurse under a nurse anesthetist's direction and supervision. The bills failed to pass. The nurse anesthetists are expected to reintroduce the bills in the next session.

NH – Nurse practitioners, including nurse anesthetists, sought to eliminate the Joint Health Council (JHC), the entity authorized to add to or alter the list of controlled substances on the formulary from which nurse practitioners may prescribe. In New Hampshire, the JHC is the only body, other than the Board of Nursing, with the authority to place limitations on the scope of practice of nurse anesthetists. A compromise measure was passed to change the composition of the JHC to include three nurses, three pharmacists and three physicians.

NJ – The Board of Nursing proposed regulations that would have permitted an applicant nurse anesthetist to work under the supervision of a nurse anesthetist. The proposed regulation would have eliminated the requirement that direct supervision shall mean the physical presence of said supervisor within the immediately available area, unit or suite in which anesthesia is being administered. As such, the proposed rule would have given an applicant nurse anesthetist less supervision than nurse anesthetists, as nurse anesthetists are required to practice under the supervision of an anesthesiologist. Following comments from the New Jersey State Society of Anesthesiologists, the Board of Nursing did not adopt the proposed regulations.

NY – The New York State Society of Anesthesiologists continues its efforts to pass S.B. 2969, legislation to define the scope of practice of nurse anesthetists. The bill would require nurse anesthetists to practice under the supervision of and in the immediate presence of an anesthesiologist or operating practitioner.

PA – The Pennsylvania Society of Anesthesiologists continues with its efforts to defeat legislation to expand the scope of practice of nurse anesthetists.

WI – The Board of Nursing proposed a rule to allow advanced practice nurses (including nurse anesthetists) to independently order laboratory testing, radiographs or electrocardiograms to assist the nurse in issuing a prescription order. The Wisconsin Society of Anesthesiologists opposed the proposed rule and worked with the state medical society and other specialty societies to require a documented relationship with a physician. The collaborative relationship is defined as a process in which an advanced practice nurse prescriber is working with a physician, in each other’s presence when necessary, to deliver health care services within the scope of the practitioner's professional expertise.

Pain Management

CT – Legislation was passed to require insurance companies and health maintenance organizations (HMOs) to cover pain management treatments and access to a pain specialist.

FL – The Board of Medicine adopted a new rule on Standards for the Use of Controlled Substances for the Treatment of Pain. The standards were developed to clarify the Board's position on pain control, specifically related to the use of controlled substances, to alleviate physician uncertainty regarding potential disciplinary action and to encourage better pain management.

Anesthesiologist's Assistants

OH – The Ohio Society of Anesthesiologists supported legislation to license anesthesiologist’s assistants (AAs) following the Attorney General's opinion that AAs had no authority to practice in the state pursuant to the delegatory authority of an anesthesiologist. The legislation was passed to license AAs. Their scope of practice is defined in the law and requires that AAs must work under the supervision of an anesthesiologist.

Reimbursement Issues

CA – Legislation was passed providing a 16.7-percent increase in Medi-Cal reimbursement, although it is yet to be determined how the increases will be distributed among the specialties.

IN – The Indiana Society of Anesthesiologists supported legislation to increase Medicaid reimbursement rates. The bill passed but was vetoed by the Governor due to budgetary constraints. It is possible that an effort will be made to override the veto.

MD – Legislation was passed to reimburse out-of-network hospital-based physicians who treat HMO patients based on 125 percent of the HMO rate for services rendered or the amount being paid for the service on January 1, 2000, whichever is greater. This provision will remain in effect until 2002. A study will be conducted to determine the appropriate methodology for reasonable payment for nonparticipating physicians.

NJ – Legislation was introduced to require Medicaid to reimburse anesthesiologists for services provided to Medicaid recipients who are not enrolled in an HMO at 80 percent of the rate the HMO currently reimburses anesthesiologists for services provided to its commercial clients. The bill has not been reported out of committee.

PA – The Pennsylvania Society of Anesthesiologists continues its work to increase reimbursement rates under the workers' compensation program.

SC – The South Carolina Society of Anesthesiologists is working to obtain an increase in reimbursement rates from Blue Cross/Blue Shield (BCBS).

WI – The Wisconsin Society of Anesthesiologists continues its efforts to increase BCBS reimbursement rates.

Tort Reform

OR – The Oregon Society of Anesthesiologists is part of a coalition effort to secure a constitutional amendment to permit the legislature to limit civil damages. The constitutional amendment is necessary because of an Oregon court decision holding that the state legislature has no jurisdiction over jury awards and, as such, cannot establish caps on damage awards.



    S. Diane Turpin, J.D., Assistant Director of Governmental Affairs (State), rejoined the ASA Washington Office in September 1999 after completing a degree in law from St. Louis University, St. Louis, Missouri. She previously was a member of the Washington Office from 1990 to 1993.


return to top

Home >Newsletters >December 2000Home >Test

 


FEATURES

Patient Care and Politics:
Making the Pieces Fit

ARTICLES


DEPARTMENTS


The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent or reflect the views, policies or actions of the American Society of Anesthesiologists.

NL Archives

Search the ASA Newsletter

Information for Authors