Home >Newsletters >March 2001
 
ASA NEWSLETTER
 
 
March 2001
Volume 65
Number 3
 
SUBSPECIALTY NEWS

ABA, ASA and ACGME: Collaboration, Clarification and Less Confusion

Francis P. Hughes, Ph.D.
Executive Vice-President American Board of Anesthesiology



The American Board of Anesthesiology (ABA), ASA and the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) are separate, independent and distinct organizations with different missions. However, ABA often works in concert with ASA and the Residency Review Committee for Anesthesiology (RRC) of ACGME to accomplish specific objectives. Their collaborative efforts help to explain why each organization often receives correspondence from anesthesiologists and residents about matters that are more appropriate for one of the other organizations to address. Understanding the mission of each organization may help to clarify their responsibilities and authority with regard to ongoing collaborative activities and to avoid confusion as they work in concert on new initiatives.

Organizational Missions

ABA exists to maintain the highest standards of practice and training in anesthesiology. It fulfills its mission by establishing and maintaining criteria for the designation of Board-certified anesthesiologists and by conducting examinations to determine whether candidates meet the required standards for certification as an ABA diplomate. ABA also informs the RRC about the training required for admission to ABA’s system for examination and certification.1

The purpose of ASA is to advance the specialty of anesthesiology and safeguard the professional interests of its members. It does this, in part, through fostering and encouraging education, research and scientific progress in anesthesiology by recommending standards of postgraduate education for qualification as a specialist in anesthesiology and by recommending standards for approval of postgraduate training centers.2 ASA also provides specific opportunities for the ongoing education of anesthesiologists.

ACGME's mission is to improve the quality of health in the United States by ensuring and improving the quality of graduate medical education for physicians in training. ACGME establishes national standards for graduate medical education. It delegates accreditation authority to RRC, which uses national standards to accredit and continually assess graduate medical education programs in anesthesiology.3

Although the three organizations have different missions, they share common educational and quality objectives and work in concert to accomplish them.

Ongoing Collaborative Efforts

ABA, ASA and the American Medical Association Section Council on Anesthesiology appoint three representatives each to RRC. Then, RRC considers applications for accreditation of new training programs. It reviews the ACGME-approved Program Requirements for Residency Education in Anesthesiology and anesthesiology subspecialties every five years and proposes revisions to them. The committee meets biannually to review reports prepared by trained residency program inspectors to assure that the programs are in substantial compliance with the program requirements.

ABA and ASA formed the Joint Council on In-Training Examinations in 1975 to develop one written examination to assess the progress of residents in training. Each organization appoints seven representatives to the In-Training Council. In 1975 and 1976, the Council administered the In-Training Examination to residents, and ABA administered a different written examination to candidates for certification. Since 1977, the Council has administered the annual In-Training Examination to ABA candidates as well as residents. The In-Training Council reports a score on the entire examination only to residents-in-training and their training program directors. ABA reports a score on a subset of the total test only to candidates in its certification system.

ABA develops the Board’s voluntary recertification examination without ASA input. Nevertheless, based on examination analyses, the Board informs the Chair of the ASA Section on Education and Research about topics that could be useful for ASA's refresher courses and other educational programs.

New Collaborative Initiatives

The American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS), ACGME and the Council of Medical Specialty Societies (CMSS) are aware of the quality improvement concepts that have been widely applied within health care organizations. They independently approved a description of the competent physician that identifies six general competencies physicians should possess. They are working in concert to ensure that evaluations of physicians in residency training and throughout their professional career assess these competencies. Physicians representing ABA, ASA and RRC have drafted an anesthesiology resident evaluation plan that identifies specialty-specific elements of the six general competencies and methods to evaluate them. All ABMS member boards are committed to evolving their recertification programs into maintenance of certification (MOC) programs that assess these six general competencies.

One of the basic components of an MOC program is evidence of a commitment to lifelong learning and involvement in a periodic self-assessment process. ABMS and CMSS are encouraging their member organizations to collaborate to develop specialty-specific, lifelong learning and self-assessment programs. ABA and ASA have formed an ad hoc planning group to explore the potential for collaboration with development and maintenance of a program of lifelong learning and self-assessment for certified and noncertified anesthesiologists. ABA and ASA collaboration would ensure convergence of the program’s educational curriculum and the content of the examination of cognitive expertise that ABA would administer to MOC candidates. There may also be the opportunity for ABA-ASA collaboration with the development of other components of the anesthesiology MOC program.

Education is the common bond among ABA, ASA and ACGME; however, there are differences among their purposes. RRC accredits programs that train anesthesiologists, ABA certifies anesthesiologists who meet its standards and ASA provides educational and self-assessment opportunities for practicing anesthesiologists to maintain and improve their competencies, in addition to advancing the specialty and safeguarding the professional interests of its members. These differences are not diminished by ongoing endeavors in which the functions of the three organizations converge. The differences will remain even as the three organizations explore new collaborative initiatives to accomplish common objectives.

Bibliography:

American Board of Anesthesiology. Booklet of Information. November 2000; Section 1.0, Purposes.

American Society of Anesthesiologists. Bylaws. 2001; Section 1.00, Purpose.

American Medical Association. Graduate Medical Education Directory 2000-2001. 2000; Section I, Introduction:11.



    Francis P. Hughes, Ph.D., resides in Cary, North Carolina.



return to top


 


FEATURES

Ethics & Patient Care: Striking a Balance

ARTICLES


DEPARTMENTS


The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent or reflect the views, policies or actions of the American Society of Anesthesiologists.

NL Archives

Information for Authors