Home >Newsletters >May 2001
 
ASA NEWSLETTER
 
 
May 2001
Volume 65
Number 5
   
Time to Take Action on Chemical Dependence

Arnold J. Berry, M.D.,
Chair Committee on Occupational Health
e


It is not uncommon that I pick up the morning newspaper and discover, say, headlines that report the death of several teenagers in an automobile accident. Unexpectedly and without warning, young lives are lost; promising futures are instantly obliterated. Parents, siblings, friends and classmates mourn the loss. Public outcries ensue, and parent groups aggressively lobby lawmakers to raise the driving age to prevent similar tragedies from occurring in the future.

It is interesting to compare the publicity and community activism generated from teenage-driving deaths with the limited reaction from the medical community when chemical dependence or drug-related suicide takes the life of an anesthesiologist or other physician. Rarely are there headlines or public outcries. But like the losses that occur from teen accidents, anesthesiologists’ deaths associated with chemical dependence are unanticipated and frequently occur in trainees or recent graduates. Their promising futures are also cut short. Parents, spouses, significant others, friends and colleagues mourn the loss. They may have sensed a change in behavior or personality in the chemically dependent anesthesiologist but often are unaware of the true cause. After the tragic event, loved ones may look back and realize that they overlooked warning signs.

Although many of us have been touched by the loss of a colleague from a drug-related death, we have not been fully aware of the true extent of the problem within the specialty of anesthesiology. Reports from drug treatment programs have revealed a greater proportion of anesthesiologist drug abusers than might be expected, but the cause of this over-representation has been debated. A recent mortality study funded by ASA has provided startling data on drug-related deaths among anesthesiologists.1 Investigators used death certificates from 1979 through 1995 to confirm causes of death and calculated cause-specific mortality rates for anesthesiologists for comparison with those of a control group of internists. The adjusted risk of drug-related suicide was over two times greater in anesthesiologists than internists, and the risk for all-drug related causes was almost three times greater in anesthesiologists. The lower mean age of death among anesthesiologists, 65.5 years versus 69.0 years respectively, was partially attributable to the larger number of deaths of young anesthesiologists from drug-related causes. Premature deaths in anesthesiologists from all drug-related causes resulted in a total loss of 2,108 life-years before age 65. Although this study provides data on deaths from chemical dependence, it does not quantify the number of anesthesiologists with chemical dependence who have been identified and treated. Information on the number of these individuals is significantly more difficult to ascertain.

For the past two decades, ASA and the Committee on Occupational Health have organized multiple educational sessions and have instituted several projects to address the issue of chemical dependence. One of the most recent activities was an open meeting of the committee held during the 2000 Annual Meeting, in which members and outside consultants were invited to present their ideas and recommendations on prevention of chemical dependence in anesthesiologists. The articles that follow are based on these presentations. The committee and its Task Force on Chemical Dependence will consider this information for planning future initiatives.

It is clear that chemical dependence continues to be an occupational hazard. Anesthesiologists can be proud of the success and national recognition they have received as a leader in patient safety, but now it is time to turn our attention to another problem. With a better understanding and awareness of factors associated with chemical dependence, we should begin to take a leadership role in the prevention, recognition and treatment of substance abuse among anesthesiologists.

Reference:

1. Alexander BH, Checkoway H, Nagahama SI, Domino KB. Cause-specific mortality risks of anesthesiologists. Anesthesiology. 2000; 93:922-930.



  Arnold J. Berry, M.D., is Professor of Anesthesiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.


return to top


 


FEATURES

Chemical Dependence:
Exposing a Silent Enemy

ARTICLES


DEPARTMENTS


The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent or reflect the views, policies or actions of the American Society of Anesthesiologists.

NL Archives

Information for Authors