Home >Newsletters >August 2001
 
ASA NEWSLETTER
 
 
August 2001
Volume 65
Number 8
   
Critical Care and Private Practice: It’s the Right Thing to Do

Vincent L. Hoellerich, M.D.
Gerald A. Maccioli, M.D.
Douglas B. Coursin, M.D.


In the 21st century, society has come to recognize the benefits of intensive care. As Michael J. Murray, M.D., Todd Dorman, M.D., and others outline in this issue, our specialty must realize our legacy and potential in this important arena. Major insurers, governmental agencies and regulatory organizations are increasingly demanding that medicine provide comprehensive critical care that meets positive outcome benchmarks at responsible costs. Anesthesiologists previously recognized and supported the acute and intensive care paradigm since the inception of the prototypical “respiratory care units” established during the 1950s’ polio outbreak. Historically, anesthesiologists played pivotal roles in the establishment of state-of-the-art neurologic and cardiopulmonary monitoring, support and resuscitation. Our specialty was also a driving force in the development of intensive care unit (ICU) organization, management and the inauguration of the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM).

Logistical factors, economic forces and clinical preference, however, resulted in preoperative assessment, intraoperative management and pain therapy being the predominant modes of contemporary anesthesia care. Many physicians are of the opinion that critical care is not worth the time and effort. We beg to differ! As discussed elsewhere, the need for quality critical care is now recognized, and reimbursement is improving. In our practices, the benefits go beyond the monetary by facilitating patient care, enhancing our practice profile and allowing us a greater role in institutional policy and politics. Current and future anesthesiologists must re-establish their natural role as intensivists and acute care physicians.

Members of ASA, the American Society of Critical Care Anesthesiologists (ASCCA) and the anesthesiology section of SCCM have called for the resurgence of training and participation in the care of the critically ill by anesthesiologists. Such training requires a recommitment to the provision of an appropriate comprehensive critical care experience within residency training. Attempts in the past to unite training programs and the private sector have fallen short due to the current focus on operating room management of patients and the lack of well-established perioperative anesthesia practices that include hospital-based acute care and critical care.

Recent articles call for well-rounded anesthesiologists with experience in critical care, ICU and systems management and the ability to provide acute hospitalist care.1, 2 Such individuals will be able to provide the level of care required by the Leapfrog Group and others. In the forthcoming 2nd edition of the ASCCA-sponsored textbook, Critical Care Medicine – Perioperative Management, we provide an outline of our growing private critical care practice. 3

A template for integrating critical care practice into a community hospital anesthesiology group is well-established at the Rex Hospital in Raleigh, North Carolina. The Rex group has wide-ranging expertise with a significant number of subspecialty-certified intensivists and pain medicine physicians to provide expertise and consultation across a number of diverse practitioners. One of the group’s members is the chief of critical care, another is the past chief of the hospital system’s medical executive committee, while other members direct perioperative and acute pain services. The Rex group applies state-of-the-art information technology to communicate among themselves and organize their practice, assign cases, manage pain and critically ill inpatients and provide acute hospitalist care. The Rex model allows an anesthesiologist to act as a perioperative physician and perform numerous important tasks within the group as a preoperative consultant, intraoperative anesthesia director and postoperative intensivist and pain manager. The physician is able to enhance hospital-based acute care by interfacing with emergency department physicians, intervening on behalf of out-of-hospital primary care doctors and providing a continuity of care from the operating room through the ICU stay.

Maintaining preoperative interaction between the patient and anesthesiologist is necessary to preserve the physician-patient relationship, facilitate patient education, optimize the use of appropriate laboratory assessment, identify high-risk patients and provide timely subspecialty evaluation and preparation. Preoperative meetings assure quality patient management and may prevent medical complications. Versatile anesthesiologists can eliminate the need for some specialist consultation by the implementation of practice guidelines, enumeration of potential problems and proactive management of high-risk patients.

Members of the Rex anesthesia group assume primary care responsibilities in the intraoperative setting by providing or directing anesthetic and analgesic treatment while simultaneously assessing and managing the patient perioperatively. In the past, anesthesiologists were thought to have played their most important roles in the intraoperative setting, but the evolution of medicine and acute and critical care management demonstrates the need for anesthesia to move into a comprehensive and perioperative process. Consistent and efficient pre- and intraoperative preparation and care aid in the successful transition to postoperative pain management and critical care.

Community hospitals often differ from academic centers, especially with regard to critical care management. Academic hospitals frequently have a number of subspecialty units that focus on specific care of the neurologic, coronary, surgical or cardiac surgical patients. Their community hospital counterparts, however, are known for the amalgamation of these units into a larger, more versatile medical-surgical ICU. Academic centers also more commonly operate their units in a closed fashion. The primary physician relinquishes control of his or her patient after admittance by critical care doctors. Community hospital ICUs, however, are usually open or semi-open, with voluntary consulting balanced between the primary physician and the intensivists. At Rex, the critical care physicians are anesthesiologists who provide the majority of medical direction or consultative intensive care at the request of the primary physician or surgeon. This is facilitated by strong physician communication, timely availability and in-house service, and stratified levels of care.

Providing physicians with broader experience in acute and critical care and greater perioperative responsibility allows them to go beyond the limits of operating room management and increase their clinical profile and institutional value. This will allow physicians to be better suited to participate in hospital programs, development, resource utilization and management.

Comprehensive perioperative care requires a synthesis of classical operating room techniques with contemporary concepts of acute hospitalist and intensivist training. Future anesthesiologists will receive more extensive training that includes broader clinical instruction in conjunction with lessons in business, computer science and more specific scientific topics. Physicians in a critical care setting must evolve with the concepts surrounding management of ICU and similar environments. It is essential that we anesthesiologists work to promote a dialogue between the specialized academic center and the practicing community physician in order to expand our role and presence in acute and critical care. The Rex model may be applied or modified to fit various practice paradigms.


References:
1. Coursin DB, Maccioli GA, Murray MJ. Anesthesiologists as Perioperative Physicians. Problems in Anesthesia. 2000; 12:40-45.
2. Coursin DB, Maccioli GA, Murray MJ. Critical Care – how goes the flow? Anesth Clin N A. 2000; 18:527-538.
3. Murray MJ, Critical Care Medicine — Perioperative Management. 2d. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven. 1997.



  Vincent L. Hoellerich, M.D., is a private practitioner at Critical Health Systems, Inc., Raleigh Practice Center and Vice-Chair, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Rex Hospital, Raleigh, North Carolina.

  Gerald A. Maccioli, M.D., is a private practitioner at Critical Health Systems, Inc., Director of Critical Care Medicine, Raleigh Practice Center, and Medical Director, Medical/Surgical ICU, Rex Hospital, Raleigh, North Carolina.

  Douglas B. Coursin, M.D., is Professor of Anesthesiology and Internal Medicine and Associate Director of the Trauma and Life Support Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.


return to top




 


FEATURES

Reaching Critical Mass in Critical Care

ARTICLES


DEPARTMENTS

The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent or reflect the views, policies or actions of the American Society of Anesthesiologists.

NL Archives

Information for Authors