Home >Newsletters >August 2001
 
ASA NEWSLETTER
 
 
August 2001
Volume 65
Number 8
 
STATE BEAT

States Address Issues of Anesthesiologist Assistants, Office-Based Anesthesia

S. Diane Turpin
Assistant Director of Governmental Affairs (State)


Anesthesiologist Assistants

Louisiana    H.B. 1828, legislation that would prohibit anesthesiologists from delegating any tasks or duties to anesthesiologist assistants (AAs), passed both the House and Senate but was vetoed by the Governor on July 6. This legislation, strongly supported by the nurse anesthetists, would have prohibited AAs from practicing in the state and would have derailed Louisiana State University’s plans to open an AA training program next year. The Governor not only vetoed H.B. 1828, but stated that he will form a commission to draft “legislation to be considered and adopted at the next special session of the legislature” to license AAs to practice in the state. The next special session will be held in October. Members of the Louisiana Society of Anesthesiologists (LSA) spent a significant amount of time and energy to defeat this onerous legislation and are to be commended for their efforts. LSA was also successful in defeating legislation this session that would have allowed nurse anesthetists to practice independently.

New Jersey    S.B. 1811 would license anesthesiologists’ assistants (AAs) in New Jersey. AAs would be permitted to assist anesthesiologists in developing and implementing an anesthesia care plan for a patient pursuant to a written practice protocol developed by the supervising anesthesiologist. AAs would be permitted to perform the following procedures in a hospital or ambulatory surgical setting: 1) obtain a patient history and present it to the supervising anesthesiologist; 2) pretest and calibrate anesthesia delivery systems; 3) monitor, obtain and interpret information from anesthesia delivery systems and monitoring equipment; 4) assist the supervising anesthesiologist with the implementation of medically accepted monitoring techniques; 5) establish basic and advanced airway interventions including intubation of the trachea and performing ventilatory support; 6) administer intermittent vasoactive drugs; 7) start and adjust vasoactive infusions; 8) administer anesthetic drugs, adjuvant drugs and accessory drugs; 9) assist the supervising anesthesiologist with the performance of epidural anesthetic procedures and spinal anesthetic procedures; 10) administer blood, blood products and supportive fluids; 11) participate in administrative activities and clinical teaching activities; 12) participate in research activities; 13) provide assistance to cardiopulmonary resuscitation teams in response to life-threatening situations; and 14) perform such other procedures suitable for discretionary and routine performance by an AA as designated by the Medical Board. The supervising anesthesiologist shall develop a written practice protocol that delineates the services that the AA is authorized to provide and the manner in which the anesthesiologist will supervise and provide medical direction. A supervising anesthesiologist shall not have more than two AAs under his or her supervision and medical direction at any one time. An AA Advisory Committee would be created under the Board of Medical Examiners.

Ohio    The Ohio Society of Anesthesiologists continues to work with the Board of Medical Examiners to develop regulations for AAs practicing in Ohio. Licensure legislation was signed into law last year.

Office-Based Anesthesia

Mississippi    The Board of Medical Licensure has proposed regulations for the office-based surgical setting. The proposed regulations classify surgeries as level I, level II and level III. Level I surgeries are minor procedures performed under topical or local anesthesia not involving drug-induced alteration of consciousness other than minimal preoperative tranquilization of the patient. Level II surgeries are those in which perioperative medication and sedation are used intravenously, intramuscularly or rectally; this includes any surgery in which the patient is placed in a state that allows the patient to tolerate unpleasant procedures while maintaining adequate cardiorespiratory function and the ability to respond purposefully to verbal command and/or tactile stimulation. For these procedures, the surgeon must have a written transfer agreement from a licensed hospital “within reasonable proximity to the office” if the surgeon does not have staff privileges at a hospital “within reasonable proximity to the office” to perform the same procedure as that being performed in the office. The surgeon must have privileges at a “local” hospital to perform the same procedure as that being performed in the office or must be able to document satisfactory completion of surgical training such as board certification or board eligibility. An anesthesiologist, nurse anesthetist or registered nurse may be utilized to assist with the anesthesia if the surgeon is certified in advanced cardiac life support. Level III surgeries are those that involve or reasonably should require the use of general anesthesia or major conduction anesthesia and preoperative sedation. ASA physical status I, II or III may be appropriate for level III surgery. For ASA physical status III patients, the surgeon must document in the patient’s record the justification and precautions that make the office an appropriate forum for the procedure. The surgeon must have privileges at a “local” hospital to perform the same procedure as that being performed in the office. An anesthesiologist or nurse anesthetist must administer the general or regional anesthesia. For level III surgery, the office “in terms of general preparation, equipment and supplies, must be comparable to a freestanding ambulatory surgical center including, but not limited to, recovery capability and must have provisions for proper record keeping.”

For all office procedures, the surgeon is required to report any adverse incidents within 15 days of occurrence to the Mississippi Board of Medical Licensure. The surgeon must maintain a log of all level II and level III procedures that must include a confidential patient identifier, the type of procedure, the type of postoperative care and any adverse incidents. The log and all surgical records must be provided to the Board of Medical Licensure upon request.

The regulations shall become effective on September 1, 2001.

Rhode Island    The Rhode Island Department of Health has proposed amending regulations adopted last year regarding office-based surgery. The existing regulations, challenged by nurse anesthetists, require a board-certified anesthesiologist to be responsible for developing certain policies and procedures in the office setting and require the operating physician and a board-certified anesthesiologist to concur in writing prior to the surgery that an ASA physical status III patient is an acceptable candidate for a surgical procedure in the office setting. The proposed regulations would require both a board-certified anesthesiologist and a certified registered nurse anesthetist (if the facility uses nurse anesthetists to administer anesthesia) to be responsible for developing the policies and procedures in the office setting. The proposed regulations would require the operating physician and a board-certified anesthesiologist to concur in writing prior to the surgery that an ASA physical status III patient is an acceptable candidate for a surgical procedure in the office setting only if the procedure requires “types of anesthesia that may fail mid-procedure necessitating the use of general anesthesia or procedures for which general anesthesia is planned.” ASA has provided comments to the Department of Health objecting to the proposed change that would require a nurse anesthetist to develop policies and procedures for the office setting in conjunction with an anesthesiologist. ASA explained that anesthesiologists have this responsibility in hospitals and that nurse anesthetists, as nonphysicians, are ill-suited for making such policy decisions. Meanwhile, the litigation on this issue continues.


return to top


 


FEATURES

Reaching Critical Mass in Critical Care

ARTICLES


DEPARTMENTS

The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent or reflect the views, policies or actions of the American Society of Anesthesiologists.

NL Archives

Information for Authors