Home >Newsletters >September 2001
 
ASA NEWSLETTER
 
 
September 2001
Volume 65
Number 9
   
A Focus on History

James C. Erickson III, M.D.



What is this?

1. A filter system
2. A Waters canister
3. A to-and-fro system
4. All of the above.

The Wood Library-Museum of Anesthesiology has an extensive collection of medical artifacts, which includes this device dating from the 1920s. (Answer to “What is this?” )



WLM Collection

Inhalation anesthesia of the early 1920s consisted of either breathing anesthetic gases and vapors via a mask and bag, or by open-drop of volatile liquids (diethyl ether or chloroform) on a gauze mask. There were no intravenous agents to speed induction. One-hundred percent nitrous oxide was administered for gas induction and attainment of maximum anesthesia. Induction was usually accomplished within two to three minutes and was followed by addition of 10 percent to 15 percent oxygen, or more, to avoid cyanosis. “Too much oxygen” was shunned to avoid diluting the nitrous oxide. If deeper anesthesia or relaxation was needed, diethyl ether, chloroform or ethyl chloride were added. High flows of the gases were maintained to avoid accumulation of carbon dioxide and the consequent “pushing” respiration that hindered abdominal surgery.1

Ralph M. Waters, M.D., applied the strategy of carbon dioxide absorption to his practice of anesthesia while in Sioux City, Iowa, from 1920 to 1921. 2 He familiarized himself with an experiment described by Dennis E. Jackson, M.D., in 1915. 3 Jackson kept two dogs anesthetized in a closed cabinet for 24 hours. It was initially filled with a given volume of nitrous oxide, with oxygen added in amounts sufficient to meet the metabolic needs of the animals. There was also a pump devised to recirculate the exhaled gases through an alkali in order to absorb carbon dioxide. The dogs emerged unharmed from this experiment.

Dr. Waters adapted this technique by introducing a canister filled with “granular sodium and calcium hydrate” between the mask and a five-liter rebreathing bag. The canister was added to the system after the induction. It was quickly inserted during an exhalation phase of respiration; some anesthetists of the era complained that this maneuver was too complex and were reluctant to accept it. Once induction was accomplished, very little additional anesthetic was added. Dr. Waters then decreased the gas flows and maintained an oxygen inflow sufficient to satisfy the patient’s metabolic needs. The gases flowed “to and fro” from patient to the bag and returned to the patient, passing through the absorbent “filter system” twice per respiratory cycle. Dr. Waters determined that the best measurements for the cylindrical canisters were 9.0 cm in diameter and 13 cm long, containing 500 grams of absorbent.

It was common practice in that era for patients to receive generous doses of morphine as preanesthetic sedation, with more opiate often added just prior to induction. This strategy enhanced the ease of induction and the attainment of deeper anesthesia. Rectal tribromethanol was often added for this purpose. Intravenous barbiturates were not yet in use until a decade later.




With the induction complete, the canister is quickly inserted into the system during the expiratory phase of respiration.6

In his first article about the to-and-fro system, Dr. Waters summarized its benefits as follows:

1. Marked improvement of economy for gases and vapors. “There is no waste of drugs into the operating room.”
2. Greater convenience in administration of inhalation anesthesia because of the use of smaller containers of gases and drugs. The reduced weight and bulk of apparatus enhanced his practice by virtue of easing the transportation of his equipment into homes and offices.
3. The odors of the anesthetics are kept away from the operating teams, and potential explosion hazards are reduced.
4. Conservation of heat and moisture contributed to the benefits of the canister system and the improved state of his patients. 2

He also emphasized its limitations and recommended these cautions for the closed system:

1. An airtight connection of the mask on the patient’s face and between all components of the system is imperative. Surgery in mouth and nose is precluded.
2. The constant addition of oxygen to satisfy the patient’s needs is necessary.
3. The absorbent must be replenished after prolonged use. Dr. Waters changed the filters after five hours of use, although others found that they lasted about 10 hours.
4. The filter can be sterilized in an autoclave. 2

Philip D. Woodbridge added his recommendation that the fine alkali dust should be forcibly blown from the canister to avoid irritation of the patient’s lungs. 5

When Dr. Waters began his work with this system, fresh gases were fed into the tail of the rebreathing bag. His experience soon suggested the advantage of placing the inflow of fresh gases and vapors into the mask or the adjacent canister to speed the change of concentrations of fresh gases more efficiently.

Dr. Waters’ innovations and his emphasis on carbon dioxide physiology and absorption and the rebreathing technique paved the way for the development of effective circle systems and for the introduction of cyclopropane several years later. The Waters canister was made by the Foregger Company and was still in commercial production during the 1960s.


References:
1. Gatch WD. The use of rebreathing in the administration of anesthetics. In: Gwathmey JT, ed. Anesthesia. New York: Appleton and Company; 1914:100-116.
2. Waters RM. Clinical scope and utility of carbon dioxid filtration in inhalation anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 1924; 3(1):20-26.
3. Jackson DE. A new method for the production of general analgesia and anaesthesia with a description of the apparatus used. J Lab & Clin Med. 1915; 1:1-12.
4. Waters RM. Advantages and technique of carbon dioxid filtration with inhalation anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 1926; 5(3):160-162.
5. Woodbridge PD. Better gas anesthesia at less cost: The carbon dioxid absorption method. Anesth Analg. 1933; 12(4):161-173.
6. Waters RM. Carbon dioxid absorption from anesthetic mixtures. Anesth Analg. 1932; 11(3):97-110.



  James C. Erickson III, M.D., is Professor Emeritus of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine at Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, Illinois. Dr. Erickson is also a volunteer at the Wood Library-Museum of Anesthesiology at the ASA headquarters in Park Ridge, Illinois.


return to top


 


FEATURES

Ralph Milton Waters, M.D.

ARTICLES


DEPARTMENTS


The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent or reflect the views, policies or actions of the American Society of Anesthesiologists.

NL Archives

Information for Authors