Home >Newsletters >December 2001
 
ASA NEWSLETTER
 
 
December 2001
Volume 65
Number 12
 
WHAT'S NEW IN…

Operating Room Management: The Quest for Information

M. Christine Stock, M.D.
Association of Anesthesia Clinical Directors


There is more information immediately available to us now than ever before. Yet, medicine lags seriously behind in the electronic information explosion, and the cost of catching up will be prohibitive for many institutions.

Our current culture mandates that high-quality medical care be delivered with efficiency, reduced costs, appropriate resource allocation and effective conflict resolution, particularly in our high-cost areas such as the operating room (O.R.), emergency departments, intensive care units, labor and delivery areas and interventional laboratories. We cannot quantify attributes such as utilization, efficiency or profit margin without data. We also require data to execute our “rules of engagement” fairly and equitably and to understand and to evaluate how our systems perform. This article will discuss O.R. data collection systems and opportunities for interinstitutional data analysis.

Our perioperative systems share many industrial engineering elements with manufacturing systems; “total case time” can be equated to “duty cycle,” for example. Therefore, many of the principles of systems analysis apply to our environment. One of the most fundamental of these principles requires that we clearly define and name data elements so that we communicate in consistent terms, both for internal evaluation and comparisons between institutions (“benchmarking”). Several years ago, the Association of Anesthesia Clinical Directors (AACD) published The Procedural Times Glossary. This document has become the industry standard for defining the intervals and events of interest in managing O.R. systems and was endorsed as such by the Association of Operating Room Nurses and the American College of Surgeons. Anesthesia information system vendors are creating data collection templates from the AACD glossary and are working toward a standardized data format. We should exert our consumer influence on these vendors to work rapidly toward adopting a standardized electronic format, which is a necessary component in the creation of a national, perioperative event electronic data bank.

Data collection methods vary from wholly manual collection (people with pencils and clipboards) to wholly electronic collection. How one designs a data collection system should be governed by what one wants to learn. Although this precept sounds ridiculously simple, one should avoid the temptation to force one’s O.R. system to fit an apparently attractive electronic system. It is not uncommon for institutions to find a seemingly attractive software package and then attempt to get the institutional systems to conform to the software. Therefore, before embarking on data collection or prior to engaging in the purchase of a data collection system, one should first identify clearly the goals for data collection. Only after these goals have been defined can one build data collection systems around these goals. Although electronic information systems have great potential to help us measure and evaluate our systems, they are expensive to purchase and laborious to install. The purchaser should define institutional goals explicitly for the vendors and write these goals into the purchase contract. For example, if one of the institutional goals is to enhance compliance with Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) billing regulations, then it is imperative that the electronic system have a method to force the user to complete the required fields to assure that the CMS-mandated data are included before the record can be closed. There will be many goals common to most institutions. Again, we should use our consumer influence to encourage vendors to include these types of features in their standard packages and insist that institutional goals of this nature be met at the time of purchase.

Some components of information systems to consider include:

  • Assignment of unique identifier for the patient
  • Institutional admission and demographics, insurance verification
  • Scheduling: cases, staff and equipment
  • Case cart preparation and preference “cards”/files
  • Patient tracking (especially important in large O.R.s); time stamp progress through all perioperative clinical events
  • Equipment tracking, ordering, inventory
  • Pharmacy charges, ordering, inventory
  • Information system interface with:
  • Hospital medical record system
    Institutional laboratories
    Blood bank
    Radiology
    Hospital billing system
    Physician office information systems

  • Medical record generation

    Preoperative evaluation and consultations
    (this should populate all other components of
    electronic record; for example, allergies entered on admission should appear in all other parts of the record)

  • Anesthesiology intraoperative record

    Nursing O.R. medical record
    Intraoperative anesthesia medical record
    Postanesthesia medical record

  • Anesthesiology:

    Physiologic information
    Professional billing
    Institutional bill

  • Compliance with federal regulations and Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations standards
  • Quality management studies and reports

Just as our medical decisions and judgments are based on data, our advice and decision-making processes in the province of O.R. management also must be data-driven. Intellectual interest in the science and innovation of O.R. systems and O.R. management styles are shared by the members of the AACD. Formed in 1988, AACD conducts two annual educational activities: a nationally acclaimed spring workshop and a half-day annual meeting on the Sunday of the ASA Annual Meeting (see <www.aacdhq.org> for further information). The Procedural Times Glossary is published in the members-only section of the AACD Web site.

Hospitals, ambulatory surgical centers and office-based surgical practices look to anesthesiologists for direction in setting guidelines that promote efficient use of precious resources while delivering high-quality care. Our goals in this capacity are to find safe, cost-effective methods of conducting O.R. practices that allocate resources fairly and predictably with minimal negative surprise and conflict. Additionally, a large national database will allow us to study clinical outcomes with statistical power not yet possible in any current data set. It is imperative that we, the consumers, insist that the electronic systems vendors establish a standard format for data acquisition so that we can realize the power of our clinical data.


    M. Christine Stock, M.D., is James E. Eckenhoff Professor and Chair, Department of Anesthesiology, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, Illinois.



return to top


 


FEATURES

ARTICLES

DEPARTMENTS

The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent or reflect the views, policies or actions of the American Society of Anesthesiologists.

NL Archives

Information for Authors