Home >Newsletters >May 2002
 
ASA NEWSLETTER
 
 
May 2002
Volume 66
Number 5
 
STATE BEAT

Wyoming Maintains Physician Supervision of Nurse Anesthetists

S. Diane Turpin, J.D., Assistant Director
Office of Governmental Affairs (State)


Wyoming Governor Jim Geringer considered an opt-out of the Medicare requirement for physician supervision of nurse anesthetists and decided "the current system is working well in our state." The governor notified constituents in a letter dated March 22, 2002, that he is not opting the state out of the Medicare requirement. In his letter, he stated, "After careful deliberation and consultation with many providers, I have determined that the best option at this time is to leave in the current language that provides for physician supervision of CRNAs." The Wyoming Society of Anesthesiologists and the Wyoming Medical Society worked tirelessly to respond to the issues raised and are grateful for the governor's thoughtful consideration of this issue.

It will come as no surprise that Minnesota Governor Jesse Ventura has opted out of the physician supervision requirement, although almost 80 percent of the citizens of Minnesota favor physician supervision. Governor Ventura, whose mother was a nurse anesthetist, supported the Clinton administration's rule that would have eliminated physician supervision of nurse anesthetists in all states.

The opt-out issue continues in Alaska, Kansas, Montana, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oregon and Washington. The process in Washington is somewhat different from other states. The Department of Health (DOH) is preparing a report for the governor that will address "issues and concerns" raised by the medical, osteopathic and nursing boards. The boards have been instructed to raise issues related to access and quality of anesthesia care but not to make recommendations as to whether or not the governor should opt out. DOH's report is expected to be presented to the governor in June.

A somewhat unusual approach to an opt-out is under way in Hawaii. Typically, consideration of an opt-out is initiated by the governor's office requesting the views of the boards of medicine and nursing. This is the approach specified in the Medicare rule. For reasons that are not clear at this time, a resolution has been introduced in the Hawaii legislature that would require the Department of Health to establish a task force to make recommendations to the governor regarding whether the state should opt out. While such a task force could allow for greater public comment, the text of the resolution appears to presuppose the outcome – that it would be in the best interests of the state to opt out. H.R. 78 remains in committee and is not expected to pass before the session ends. Even if the resolution passed and a task force addressed the issue, the governor must adhere to the requirements in the Medicare rule. He must consult with the boards of medicine and nursing regarding access to and quality of care, find that an opt-out is consistent with state law and determine that it is in the best interests of the citizens of the state to opt out.

States considering an opt-out are located predominantly in the Midwest and along the West Coast. The trend may be shifting now with interest growing in Vermont. The Vermont State Board of Nursing has circulated a survey to nurse anesthetists as well as background information prepared by the American Association of Nurse Anesthetists. The survey asks for practice location, whether the nurse anesthetist is supervised and how and whether the nurse anesthetist favors opting out. The board is seeking this information "before it responds or doesn't respond" to the option.

Office-Based Anesthesia
Readers will recall that the Florida District Court of Appeals upheld the Board of Medicine's rule requiring anesthesiologist participation in all Level III procedures performed in the office setting. The Florida Senate considered an amendment to a health-care package that would have eliminated this provision of the office surgery rules. The amendment was defeated.

In Virginia, H.B. 213 passed the House and Senate to require the Board of Medicine to establish qualifications for registration, certification or licensure of physicians' offices for the performance of outpatient surgery.


return to top

 


 


FEATURES

Anesthesiology in the Electronic Era

ARTICLES

DEPARTMENTS

The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent or reflect the views, policies or actions of the American Society of Anesthesiologists.

NL Archives

Information for Authors