Home >Newsletters >August 2002
 
ASA NEWSLETTER
 
 
August 2002
Volume 66
Number 8
 

Critical Care Medicine Is the Practice of Anesthesiology!

Michael J. Murray, M.D., Ph.D., Chair
Committee on Critical Care Medicine and Trauma Medicine




"Our airway management skills, familiarity with and knowledge of mechanical ventilators and our experience with fluid resuscitation and with the use of sedatives, analgesics, neuromuscular blocking agents, inotropes and vasopressors are unmatched by any other specialty."

A few years ago, the American Medical Association (AMA) adopted as policy that anesthesiology is the practice of medicine. Similarly, anesthesiologists who specialize in critical care medicine believe firmly that critical care medicine is the practice of anesthesiology. Unfortunately, not many anesthesiologists have that same perception; less than 1,000 anesthesiologists have certification by the American Board of Anesthesiology (ABA) in critical care medicine. ASA's Committee on Critical Care Medicine and Trauma Medicine (CCMTM) focuses on improving the care that critically ill patients and trauma victims receive. In this issue of the ASA NEWSLETTER, we will focus on new developments in critical care medicine. The events of September 11, 2001, have had a profound effect on all of us, and in recent months, members of the committee have written articles to educate anesthesiologists on disaster preparedness. These articles have appeared in the March 2002 NEWSLETTER and in the Anesthesia Patient Safety Foundation Newsletter (Vol. 17, No. 1, 1-20).

The committee hopes you have read these articles and that you will maintain your education in preparation for the next act of terrorism or the next natural catastrophe for which our expertise will be required. The same expertise that is of benefit in disaster response also is of great value in managing critically ill patients outside the operating room. Our airway management skills, familiarity with and knowledge of mechanical ventilators and our experience with fluid resuscitation and with the use of sedatives, analgesics, neuromuscular blocking agents, inotropes and vasopressors are unmatched by any other specialty. We should be and need to be more visible outside the operating room.

No physician group places more pulmonary artery catheters than we do. It is for this reason that C. William Hanson III, M.D., and William H. Montgomery, M.D., have agreed to provide an update on the pulmonary artery catheter education program (page 7). ASA and the CCMTM committee are committed to representing anesthesiologists as we work with other specialties and nonphysician health professionals to ensure that any pulmonary artery catheter education project meets our members' needs. Anesthesiologists also should be aware that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has published new "Guidelines for the Prevention of Intravascular Catheter-Related Infections," which have been developed and endorsed by several specialty groups, including the American Society of Critical Care Anesthesiologists (ASCCA). The guidelines can be found at . All anesthesiologists should be familiar with the guidelines as they recommend gowning and gloving prior to central line placement.

Equally important to all anesthesiologists are the recommendations being promulgated by the Leapfrog Group. Peter J. Pronovost, M.D., Ph.D., has co-written an article in this issue (page 10) commenting upon these recommendations. The Leapfrog Group is a consortium of some of the largest U.S. corporations that have hundreds of thousands of beneficiaries (employees and their families). These corporations have been dissatisfied with the care that their beneficiaries currently receive; therefore, they want to "leapfrog" out of the current medical system and refer their beneficiaries to systems that provide improved outcomes and excellent care. The Leapfrog Group's current focus is to: 1) refer patients to hospitals that do a high volume of surgical procedures of the type for which the patient is being referred, 2) refer them to hospitals that have systems in place to improve the accuracy of prescriptions and 3) refer their beneficiaries to hospitals that have intensive care units (ICUs) staffed by board-certified intensivists. No better opportunity exists for anesthesiologists to improve their visibility outside of an operating room than facilitating hospitals' "compliance" with these recommendations.

Finally, despite what we on the CCMTM committee perceive as outstanding opportunities within the ICU for our expertise, over the last 10 years, the number of anesthesiology residents who choose to do a critical care medicine fellowship and who remain in critical care has been approximately 40 to 50 residents per year out of a pool of approximately 1,500 residents. William E. Hurford, M.D., Chair of the ASCCA Committee on Manpower and Training, and colleagues share their thoughts on how our recruitment of future anesthesia-intensivists might be improved (page 12).

For those of you who do not work in an ICU and have no desire to, we can respect your preferences but hope that you will support your colleagues who do elect to improve the outcome of critically ill patients and to enhance our visibility and public acceptance for the care that we provide in ICUs.



    Michael J. Murray, M.D., Ph.D., is Professor and Chair, Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.

 


return to top


 


FEATURES

Code Red: Who Will Revive Critical Care Medicine?

ARTICLES


DEPARTMENTS


The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent or reflect the views, policies or actions of the American Society of Anesthesiologists.

NL Archives

Information for Authors