|
The Committee on Quality Management and Departmental
Administration (QMDA) receives many questions each
year from ASA members about a variety of issues
predominantly related to quality-of-care standards
set by the Joint Commission on Accreditation of
Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) and other regulatory
requirements. This article summarizes several of
the “hotter” issues addressed over the
past couple of years.
Implementing Policy for JCAHO Patient Safety
Goals for Monitoring
JCAHO approved the 2004 National Patient Safety
Goals (NPSGs) in July 2003. NPSGs are not standards,
but, as of January, hospitals are being surveyed
for these goals. The goals include improving accuracy
of patient identification, effectiveness of communication
and safety of high-alert medications while eliminating
wrong-site and wrong-patient surgery, improving
infusion pump safety, improving effectiveness of
clinical alarm systems and reducing nosocomial infections.
Details are available on the JCAHO Web site at <www.jcaho.com/accredited+organizations/patient+safety/npsg.htm>.
Although there are no requirements for performance
measurements relating to NPSGs, there is a requirement
to be in compliance with the goals and their specific
recommendations. For example compliance with Goal
1 requires that prior to the start of any surgical
procedure, a final verification process must confirm
the correct patient, procedure and site. With that
in mind, ASA assisted JCAHO, along with more than
40 other major organizations, in the development
of a universal protocol for preventing wrong-site
surgery. This protocol can be found at <www.jcaho.com/accredited+organizations/patient+safety/universal+protocol/index.htm>.
Goal 6 also has raised concerns from members about
compliance requirements. This goal intends to “improve
the effectiveness of clinical alarm systems (by
requiring institutions to): a) implement regular
preventive maintenance and testing of alarm systems”
and “b) assure that alarms are activated with
appropriate settings and are sufficiently audible
with respect to distances and competing noise within
the unit.”
While it originated from the “Sentinel Event
Alert” on ventilator-related events, JCAHO
has expanded the scope to the “full spectrum
of alarm systems that are triggered by physical
or physiological monitoring of the individual.”
Alarms must be activated, set properly and sufficiently
audible for the practice setting in which they are
applied. Again there is no specific requirement
for documentation, but JCAHO reviewers may evaluate
compliance by direct observation in an operating
room or postanesthesia care unit (PACU). It is not
yet clear exactly how “appropriate settings”
in the operating room will be surveyed.
Locking Anesthesia Carts — JCAHO and Others’
Regulatory Requirements
This issue has a history resembling an unending
fugue. Representatives from QMDA have consistently
tried to educate our regulators and accreditors
about the substantial unintended consequences of
locking carts, including not having equipment and
drugs needed for emergency intubations and airway
management, vasopressor support, treatment of ischemia,
etc. These are the sentinel events that plague the
first few minutes that patients are in the operating
room (O.R.), especially in the case of sicker patients.
Prompt intervention in these instances prevents
death. Over the last decade, JCAHO has developed
a practical approach to drug security that requires
drugs to be secure but does not require locking
them away from immediate access. This is reflected
in the newly reorganized 2004 Comprehensive Accreditation
Manual for Hospitals. In particular the chapter
on medication management, MM.2.20, requires that
“Medications are properly and safely stored
throughout the organization.” The scored element
of performance requires that medications be secured
so that unauthorized persons cannot obtain access.
JCAHO interprets this to mean that medication carts
must be secure but not necessarily locked. Drugs
left unattended in the open violate the standard.
Secured O.R.s with constant supervision should not
need to have drug carts locked. The Centers for
Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) — ironically
located on Security Boulevard in Baltimore, Maryland
— require a lock to ensure medication security.
Therefore JCAHO may use this interpretation of “secure”
if the hospital is using the survey for Medicare
certification (deemed status). ASA, through the
work of QMDA, is in the process of formulating a
position statement designating the operating room
as a secure area that does not require physical
locking of carts. The policy, currently in draft
form, is an attempt to resolve the differences between
the regulatory interpretations of JCAHO and CMS.
Issues Related to Sedation by Nonanesthesiologists
The guidelines promulgated by ASA in the mid-1990s
in this area are based on the skills and measures
necessary to handle the continuum of sedation. Individuals
providing moderate or deep sedation and anesthesia
should have, at a minimum, some form of competency
based education, training and experience in evaluation
of patients before the procedure, performing moderate
or deep sedation and rescuing patients from a deeper-than-desired
level of sedation or analgesia. JCAHO interprets
the ability to rescue patients to include demonstrated
competence in airway management to provide adequate
oxygenation and ventilation for moderate sedation
along with competence to manage an unstable cardiovascular
system for deep sedation.
Each organization is free to determine the required
credentials of persons permitted to administer moderate
or deep sedation. Acceptable examples offered by
JCAHO include, but are not limited to, advanced
cardiac life-support certification or satisfactory
completion of a written examination or mock rescue
developed in concert with the institution’s
anesthesiologists.
Whether nonanesthesiologists should demonstrate
intubation skills as opposed to general airway management
skills to receive credentials for deep sedation
is not resolved. Consequently ASA representatives
to JCAHO’s Professional Technical Advisory
Committee will continue to carefully monitor changes
to the accreditation process. Changes in state law
also will need the careful attention of both ASA
and state component societies as moderate and deep
sedation becomes more popular in office settings.
This summary is too brief to serve as a comprehensive
guide, and it omits many other areas of concern
to ASA members who have corresponded with QMDA.
These include appropriate exceptions to sedation
standards for intensive care unit (ICU) patients,
differences between the standards of care and documentation
applicable to patients recovering in a PACU as opposed
to those directly admitted to the ICU, physician
health and its role in credentialing and privileging,
distribution and refrigeration of blood in O.R.s,
the timing and elements of the preinduction check,
controlled substances, informed consent, obtaining
medications by O.R. nurses for anesthesiologists,
preoperative evaluation and re-evaluation, demonstrating
competency for credentialing and privileging, definition
of licensed independent practitioner, how to share
quality information without violating the Health
Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, labeling
of medications and syringes and how to deal with
patients who have do-not-resuscitate orders. QMDA
regularly corresponds with individual ASA members
who request assistance in addressing such questions
related to quality of care and regulatory issues
related to accreditation.
Bibliography:
JCAHO responses to frequently asked questions regarding
standards <www.jcaho.org/accredited+organizations/standards+faqs.htm>.
JCAHO responses to frequently asked questions regarding
national patient safety goals <www.jcaho.org/accredited+organizations/patient+safety/npsg.htm>.
Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare
Organizations. Comprehensive Accreditation Manual
for Hospitals. 2004.
Practice Guidelines for Sedation and Analgesia by
Nonanesthesiologists. Anesthesiology. 2002;
96:1004-1017.
| |
|
Jerry A. Cohen, M.D., Associate Professor of
Anesthesiology, University of Florida, Gainesville,
Florida. |
|
| |
|
Robert S. Lagasse, M.D., Professor and Vice-Chair,
Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore
Medical Center, Bronx, New York. |
|
|