ASA Financial Check-Up: Are the Mission and the Checkbook
in Alignment?
pen
an organization’s “checkbook” and
you should clearly see its moral and ethical compass,
its vision and its mission. I believe ASA is no exception
to this rule. Through its House of Delegates (HOD),
the Society strives to bring the voice of the membership
to all of its deliberations and decisions. Approximately
two-thirds of the annual budget is dedicated to those
programs and initiatives that the HOD deems most relevant
to the integrity of the practice of anesthesiology
and value to the membership.
Upon review of the budget for the past several years,
it is clear that ASA is dedicated to bringing relevant
education and resources to its members that will foster
the development and communication of new knowledge.
Our Foundations are an example of this, where we have
spent approximately 10 percent of our annual income
to promote patient safety (Anesthesia Patient Safety
Foundation [APSF]), foster new knowledge (Foundation
for Anesthesia Education and Research [FAER]) and
preserve our rich history (Wood Library-Museum of
Anesthesiology [WLM]). This is in addition to the
numerous committees and initiatives that ASA has created
at the direction of the HOD. The ASA Annual Meeting
is considered the premier venue for educational opportunities
for anesthesiologist worldwide. Likewise, the journal
Anesthesiology is among the best of all medically
oriented publications. On the whole, more than 40
percent of our revenue is dedicated to promoting new
and current knowledge in anesthesiology.
In addition to our commitment to clinical excellence
and safety, ASA has a primary role in advocacy and
practice management. Our Washington Office staff is
among the most respected on the Hill and has had a
terrific impact on our behalf over the years. The
Legislative Conference is a sell-out every year, and
our ASA Political Action Committee is among the most
effective political action committees. Similarly,
our annual Conference on Practice Management continues
to set record numbers in attendance and has become
the “must attend” conference for many
of our members. In all, we spend approximately 15
percent of our annual revenues toward practice management
and advocacy-related activities.
The financial affairs of the Society are delegated
to the Section on Fiscal Affairs (SFA), with ultimate
authority granted to the ASA Board of Directors. This
section consists of the treasurer, the assistant treasurer
and members of the Committee on Finance of the Board
of Directors. All actions and reports of the SFA and
the board are subject to review and/or approval by
the House of Delegates.
The fiscal year for ASA is also the calendar year,
which is typical for many organizations and businesses.
Though we were budgeted for a slight net loss this
past year, the budget came in with a very strong bottom
line at more than $2.2 million. This considerable
swing from budget to actual is related to unbudgeted
revenue from publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
and to the conservative spending by the committee
chairs and members. The 2007 budget is also targeted
for a net loss, but year-to-date is tracking very
close to the prior year performance. Our total assets
continue to grow as a result of our strong financial
management in the Park Ridge, Illinois, office as
well as a sound investment strategy. Our audit occurs
annually by the firm of Blackman & Kallick. There
have been no concerns or recommendations from our
auditors.
The budgeting process begins early in the fiscal year
when a request is made to all committee chairs to
submit a budget request for the following year. This
documentation is then compiled along with the proposed
budgets for the Park Ridge and the Washington offices.
The SFA meets at the March meeting of the Board of
Directors and considers funding proposals from APSF,
FAER and WLM and makes recommendations to the Budget
Committee on their funding as well as other issues
of importance to creation of the next year’s
budget. The Budget Committee (consisting of the president,
president-elect, first vice-president, treasurer and
assistant treasurer), along with ASA staff, then meets
in the late spring to create a draft budget. This
budget goes to the Administrative Council for consideration
and approval in June and is subsequently presented
at the Board of Directors meeting in August for approval.
Final approval is vested in the HOD at the Annual
Meeting. Modifications to the budget can and do occur
throughout the year at the discretion of the president
and the board within rules established by the Society.
The ASA balance sheet reveals a very strong cash and
cash equivalent position. ASA’s assets at the
end of the 2006 fiscal year were in excess of $60
million and have continued to grow through the 2007
fiscal year. The Society’s assets are invested
in a diversified portfolio that reflects a balance
of 35 percent fixed assets and 65 percent equities.
This investment strategy was fully implemented in
January 2007 and has yielded a return of more than
14 percent from July 2006 to June 2007. The firm of
DiMeo Schneider & Associates manages the overall
portfolio and meets with the SFA on a quarterly basis
by conference call or in person.
In conclusion the 2007 ASA fiscal checkup reveals
a strong and vibrant Society dedicated to creating
member value. The mission, vision and values of the
Society continue to be the lighthouse that guides
the budgeting process. I thank all the members of
the SFA for their hard work and dedication: James
D. Grant, M.D. (Assistant Treasurer), James M. West,
M.D. (Committee on Finance Chair), Karl E. Becker,
Jr., M.D., Richard R. Johnston, M.D., Lawrence J.
Roy, M.D., and Kenneth I. Mirsky, M.D. I also commend
our current President, Mark J. Lema, M.D., Ph.D.,
for his hard work and prudent financial decisions
as he leads this great Society.
return to top
|