Home >Test
 
Syllabus on Geriatric Anesthesiology
 
 

Muscle Relaxant Selection and Administration


Cynthia A. Lien, M.D.
Associate Professor of Anesthesiology, Cornell University
New York Presbyterian Hospital
calien@mail.med.cornell.edu

Aging affects the neuromuscular junction in many ways. The distance between the junctional axon and the motor end-plate is increased; the folds of the motor end-plate are flattened; the concentration of acetylcholine receptors at the motor end-plate is decreased; the amount of acetylcholine in the junctional vesicles is decreased; and the amount of acetylcholine released is also decreased. In spite of all of these changes in the neuromuscular junction, alterations in the pharmacodynamics of nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents in the elderly are largely due to alterations in the pharmacokinetics of these agents. Sensitivity of the acetylcholine receptor to neuromuscular blocking agents is not affected by advanced age. Altered pharmacokinetics are the result of decreases in hepatic and renal blood flow and function that occur with advanced age as well as altered volumes of distribution of relaxants in geriatric patients.

Clearance is decreased in the elderly for those nondepolarizing muscle relaxants that depend primarily on either the kidney or the liver for their elimination from the plasma. The long-acting agents metocurine, pancuronium and d-tubocurarine have all been found to have a prolonged duration of action in the elderly. Surprisingly, the newer long-acting relaxants, doxacurium and pipecuronium, which still depend on renal mechanisms for elimination from the body, seem to have pharmacodynamics that are unaffected by advanced age. Of the intermediate-acting relaxants, vecuronium and rocuronium, both of which depend on end-organ elimination from the body, have prolonged durations of action. Atracurium and cisatracurium, which depend on the kidney only as a secondary means of elimination from the body, do not have a prolonged duration of action in the elderly. They are eliminated primarily by Hofmann elimination, which is a temperature and base catalyzed process of spontaneous degradation. The process is not affected by advanced age. Mivacuriumâs duration of action in the elderly is prolonged because of the decreases in plasma cholinesterase activity that accompany aging.

In choosing a nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking agent to provide relaxation during an anesthetic, the use of the intermediate-acting agents is prudent as the duration of action of even a single dose of a long-acting agent may be too prolonged for the planned surgery. Mivacuriumâs only potential advantage as a muscle relaxant with a short duration of action may be lost in the elderly as it may behave pharmacokinetically as an intermediate-acting relaxant. In general, when maintaining neuromuscular blockade with nondepolarizing relaxants one can expect that the dosing interval will be increased and that fewer doses of relaxant will be required to maintain the desired depth of neuromuscular block. Atracurium and cisatracurium may be the only exceptions to this.

The choice of nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking agent and monitoring of the depth of blockade are exceptionally important in this patient population as recovery of neuromuscular function is generally delayed in the elderly. Inadequate or incomplete recovery of neuromuscular function is associated with a greater incidence of perioperative pulmonary complications.

Bibliography:

  • Frolkis VV, Martynenko OA, Zamostyan VP. Aging of the neuromuscular apparatus. Gerontology. 1976; 22(4):244-279.Matteo RS, Backus WW, McDaniel DD, et al.
  • Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of d-tubocurarine and metocurine in the elderly. Anesth Analg. 1985; 64(1):23-29.
  • Berg H, Roed J, Viby-Mogensen J, et al. Residual neuromuscular block is a risk factor for postoperative pulmonary complications. A prospective, randomised, and blinded study of postoperative pulmonary complications after atracurium, vecuronium and pancuronium. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1997; 41(9):1095-1103.


return to top


 



The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent or reflect the views, policies or actions of the American Society of Anesthesiologists.

Table of Contents