Journal CME - 2016 September
Back to Journal CME - 2016 September
Journal CME - 2016 September

Journal CME - 2016 September

Summary:

Background: It is unclear whether recognition of epidural catheter failures is delayed with combined spinal epidural technique (CSE) compared to traditional epidural technique (EPID) when used for labor analgesia. The authors hypothesized that recognition of failed catheters is not delayed by CSE.
Methods: Anesthetic, obstetric, and quality assurance records from 2,395 labor neuraxial procedures (1,440 CSE and 955EPID) performed at Forsyth Medical Center (Winston-Salem, North Carolina) between June 30 and December 31, 2012, were retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcome was catheter survival (failure-free) time during labor analgesia. A proportional hazards model with the counting method was used to assess relationships between the techniques and survival (failurefree) time of catheters, while controlling for subjects’ body mass index and providers’ level of training in the final best-fit multivariable regression model.
Results: Cumulative incidence of epidural catheter failures was 6.6% for CSE and 11.6% for EPID (P = 0.001). In the multivariable regression model, catheters placed with CSE versus epidural were less likely to fail (hazard ratio, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.79; P = 0.0002) for labor analgesia. Among the catheters that failed, there was no overall difference in failure time course between the techniques (hazard ratio, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.89 to 1.54; P = 0.26) even though more failed catheters with CSE (48.4%) than with EPID (30.6%) were recognized within the first 30 min of placement (P = 0.009).
Conclusions: In this cohort, CSE has a significantly lower risk of overall epidural catheter failures than EPID and does not delay recognition of epidural catheter failures. Choice of CSE versus EPID should be based on overall risk of failure, efficacy, and side effects.

CME Credit: 1.00 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™

Required Hardware / Software:
Adobe Acrobat Reader, Internet connection. Web browser version must have been released within the last three years.

Activity Release Date:
08/16/2016

Activity Expiration Date:
08/15/2019

  • List Price: $20.00
  • Member Price: Free
 
Want to save more?
Log into see if you qualify for a lower rate.
Members save $20.00 or more Join
Item Details:

Learning Objectives: After successfully completing this activity, the learner will be able to:

  1. List the advantages of combined spinal epidural (CSE) technique compared to the traditional epidural (EPID) technique for labor analgesia (1, 2)
  2. Specify the patient and provider factors that make it...
Back to Journal CME - 2016 September
View More View Less
Back to Product Detail
There are not any reviews for this product.

Thank You Industry Supporters

Whose contributions allow the American Society of Anesthesiologists® to create world-class education and resources to improve patient care and outcomes.

Learn More