Home     |    Contact ASA     |     Join ASA!    |     Members Only     |    Retail Store   |    Advertising Information
 
ASA NEWSLETTER
 
 
September 1998
Volume 62
Number 9
 

Neonatal Pain: The Evolution of an Idea

Doris K. Cope, M.D., Trustee
Wood Library-Museum of Anesthesiology



The International Society for the Study of Pain defines pain as "an unpleasant experience, sensorial and emotional, associated with tissue damage, actual or potential, described in terms of their damage." Since prehistoric times, the emotional component of pain or meaning of the sensory experience of pain has been interpreted in the cultural context of the time. This has been particularly true for infant children who are unable to articulate their pain.

St. Augustine, in the fifth century C.E., described pain in the newborn as thus: "All diseases of Christians are to be ascribed to demons, chiefly do they torment the fresh baptized, yea even the guiltless newborn infant." The Aphorisms of Hippocrates include the axiom, "Those who are used to bearing an accustomed pain, even if they be weak and old, bear it more easily than the young and strong who are unaccustomed." In caring for infants undergoing surgical procedures, an important if not the quintessential question an anesthesiologist must answer is, "Does a neonate feel or experience pain?"

Until the 20th century, physicians believed that children experienced more pain than adults. In 1656, Felix Wurtz in The Children's Book, expressed the idea that the less mature the infant, the greater degree of pain was experienced:

"If a new skin in old people be tender, what is it you think in a newborn Babe? Doth a small thing pain you so much on a finger, how painful is it then to a Child, which is tormented all the body over, which hath but a tender new grown flesh? If such a perfect Child is tormented so soon, what shall we think of a Child, which stayed not in the wombe its full time? Surely it is twice worse with him."

Pain in the mid-19th century was considered very real in the infant. Some practitioners of the day believed that the source of pain could be localized based on the infant's response. This theory was debunked by J. Forsyth Meigs, M.D., in his textbook, Practical Treatise on the Diseases of Children, published in 1853. He describes pain in infants in the following way:

"Pain may almost always be detected by the expression of the face. It gives to the countenance various shades of expression, according to its degree of severity, and its permanency or recurrence at intervals. Pain in the head is said, by Dr. M. Hall, to produce a contracted brow, pain in the belly to occasion an elevation in the upper lip, whilst pain in the chest is chiefly denoted by sharpness of the nostrils. I doubt, however, whether pain in any particular organ imparts an expression to one part of the face rather than to another ..."

In 1898, A. Jacobi's Therapeutics of Infancy and Childhood was published and became a standard American pediatric handbook. In the chapter, "General Therapeutics," the author cautions against chloroform producing superficial respirations and ether anesthesia producing a detrimental effect on kidneys and the "respiratory organs." He certainly was aware not only of the need for anesthetic in the newborn, but the difficulty of accomplishing it successfully:

"The difficulty in obtaining a complete narcosis is particularly great in the newly born. The stage of excitement is brief, the pulse becomes frequent and the pupils contract. However, after a short time the pulse becomes slow and the pupils dilate. The after-effects are not so inconvenient as they often prove in the adult; children vomit less frequently and less profusely, and certainly with greater facility and ease than adults. They are liable to remain under the influence of the anaesthetic a long time after an operation has been completed. After tracheotomies, which I never performed without chloroform unless the children were asphyxiated by carbonic acid poisoning, the patients are apt to sleep long and undisturbed. Thus they require a ceaseless watching until the effect has surely passed away. Through the opened trachea, children will become under the influence of chloroform very easily. Five or six drops on a sponge or on some absorbent cotton held in the mouth of the tube by means of a pair of pincers has an almost instantaneous effect."

When did the transition in common wisdom from infants being perceived as hyper-analgesic to hypo-analgesic occur? One interesting possibility is that the shift occurred at the time of the development of experimental embryology with its applications to development of the nervous system and the experience of pain. This theoretical framework was reinforced by the popularization of Darwin's theories leading to the conclusion that infants and neonates experience little pain.

In 1872, Paul Emil Flechsig, working in a laboratory in Leipzig, noted that the myelination of nerve fibers occurred at different rates during development and that in the newborn baby both myelinated and nonmyelinated fibers were present with only myelinated fibers believed to be fully functional. The conclusion was that, biologically, newborns were not completely "wired," and thus, their experience of sensory input such as pain was likewise less than completely functional.

Also in the same year, Charles Darwin, in his work, The Expression of Emotions in Man and Animal, adamantly refused to believe that children's facial expressions, cries and tears, convulsive movements, and vascular and breathing changes reflected the sensory or emotional experience of pain, but were just reflex actions, reinforced by habit. Indeed, he said that expressions of pain in the select tribe including "animals, children, savages, and the insane" could under no circumstances imply the awareness of pain. These new scientific theories based on Darwin's theories and the anatomical and histological data from embryology were applied to clinical practice by surgeons and neurologists.

In the late 19th century, when Darwin expressed his views, infant mortality was high and there were very few operations in children. With increased pediatric surgical procedures, it was quite common, even up until the 1950s, to perform antrotomies in the auditory canal, paracenteses, connect spermatic-cord torsions, or even perform abdominal surgery without any anesthesia.

In the 20th century, however, the view that neonates experienced less pain was not strongly advanced. M. Thorek, in his textbook, Modern Surgical Technique, published in 1938, described his views of adequate pediatric anesthesia: "Often no anesthesia is required. A sucker consisting of a sponge dipped in some sugar water will often suffice to calm a baby." Learning theorists pointed to additional proof that infants did not experience pain, including: 1) the general absence of childhood memories, 2) the conviction that infants' tracts linking the thalamus to the cortex were not functional and 3) experimental animal data on "thalamic" animals showing reflex activity when exposed to noxious stimuli. The practical consequence of these advances in science resulted in undertreatment or no treatment of pain in infants.

However, in 1952, a French neurologist, André-Thomas, advocated caution regarding the exact function of the myelin sheath based on studies in young animals demonstrating that nonmyelinated fibers could be excited.

Such entrenched theory dies hard, so that as late as 1968, surgeons L.I. Swafford, M.D., and D. Allen, M.D., contended, "Pediatric patients seldom need medication for the relief of pain after general surgery. They tolerate discomfort well."

The idea of infants not experiencing pain after noxious stimuli was still prevalent in conventional wisdom as seen in the popular press. There was no clearer demonstration of this than in the advice given to parents circumcising their male newborns. In 1982, Proctor and Gamble promoted Pampers to parents by providing Expectant Parents' Information Kits, which included the statement: "You may be surprised to learn that circumcision will not be painful to your baby because, at this early stage of development, the penis does not yet have functioning pain nerve endings." Mother's Manual, published the same year, argues against local anesthesia for circumcision: "It swells the area to the extent of making an unsatisfactory circumcision too likely."

Medical opinion began to change in the 1980s. Studies in neonatal pain measured behavioral, physiologic and biochemical responses to pain. While the behavioral changes had been explained as simple learned reflexes, the changes in physiological parameters and O2 saturation after endotracheal intubation were more difficult to explain. Perhaps the most convincing studies demonstrating the real phenomenon of neonatal pain were a series of papers, published in the late 1980s, showing the hormonal and metabolic responses in infants undergoing surgery that were attenuated by general anesthesia. Since that time, numerous pain scales have been proposed to assess pediatric pain.

Today, the concept of neonatal and pediatric pain is well-established, and the lesson to be learned by the medical community is the need for caution in applying experimental findings in isolated animal proposals and philosophical theorems to clinical practice. It is ironic to note that at one time in our medical history, a simple unlettered parent could more accurately diagnose pain in their infant child than the most advanced experimental scientist or state-of-the-art philosopher.

References:

  1. Haggard HW. Devils, Drugs and Doctors: The Story of the Science of Healing from Medicine-Man to Doctor. London: Heinemann, 1929:281-397. As written by AM Unruh in her article, Voices from the past: ancient views of pain in childhood. The Clinical Journal of Pain. 1992; 8:248.
  2. Chadwick J, Mann WN. The Medical Works of Hippocrates: A New Translation from the Original Greek Made Especially for English Readers. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1950:150-60. As written by AM Unruh in her article, Voices from the past: ancient views of pain in childhood. The Clinical Journal of Pain. 1992; 8:248.
  3. Ruhrah J. Pediatrics of the Past. New York: Paul B. Hoeber, 1925. As written by AM Unruh in her article, Voices from the past: ancient views of pain in childhood. The Clinical Journal of Pain. 1992; 8:248.
  4. Meigs JF. A Practical Treatise on the Diseases of Children. Philadelphia: Lindsay and Blackiston, 1853:23.
  5. Jacobi A. Therapeutics of Infancy and Childhood. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott Company, 1898:82.
  6. Darwin C. The Expression of Emotions in Man and Animals (1st ed. 1872), L'Expression des émotions, chez l'homme et les animaux (1st ed Fr. trans. 1874) re-ed. from 2nd Eng. edition 1890), Verviers, Ed. Complexe (1981). As written by R Rey in her book, History of Pain. Paris: Éditions La Découverte, 1993:314.
  7. André-Thomas. Ontongénèse de la vie psycho-affective et de la douleur. Affect et Affectivité. La Douleur et les douleurs, supervised by P Alajouanine. Paris: Masson, 1956:55. As written by R Rey in her book, History of Pain. Paris: Éditions La Découverte, 1993:315.
  8. Thorek M. Modern Surgical Technique, vol. III. Montreal: Lippincott, 1938:2021. As written by AM Unruh in her article, Voices from the past: ancient views of pain in childhood. The Clinical Journal of Pain. 1992; 8:249.
  9. André-Thomas. Études neurologiques sur le nouveau-né et le jeune nourrisson (Neurological Study of the Newborn and Young Infant). Paris: Masson et Cie, 1952:1. As written by R Rey in her book, History of Pain. Paris: Éditions La Découverte, 1993:313.
  10. Swafford LI, Allen D. Pain relief in the pediatric patient. Med Clin North Am. 1968; 52:131-136. As written by AM Unruh in her article, Voices from the past: ancient views of pain in childhood. The Clinical Journal of Pain. 1992; 8:249.
  11. Expectant Parents' Information Kit. Distributed by Pampers, Proctor and Gamble Co., Cincinnati, OH, 1982, #241-2811:22.
  12. Brown WR and Kane L. Routine Circumcision: A Re-Evaluation Mother's Manual, Feb. 1982:14.
  13. Marshall TA, Deeder R, Pai S, et al. Physiologic changes associated with endotracheal intubation in preterm infants. Crit Care Med. 1984; 12:501-503. As written by T Blauer and D Gerstmann in their article, A simultaneous comparison of three neonatal pain scales during common NICU procedures. The Clinical Journal of Pain. 1998; 14:40.
  14. Gibbons PA, Swedlow DB. Changes in oxygen saturation during elective tracheal intubation in infants. Anesth Analg. 1986; 65:S58. As written by T Blauer and D Gerstmann in their article, A simultaneous comparison of three neonatal pain scales during common NICU procedures. The Clinical Journal of Pain. 1998; 14:40.
  15. Anand KJS, Hickey PR. Randomized trial of high-dose sufentanil anesthesia in neonates undergoing cardiac surgery: effects on the metabolic stress response. Anesthesiology. 1987; 67:A502. As written by T Blauer and D Gerstmann in their article, A simultaneous comparison of three neonatal pain scales during common NICU procedures. The Clinical Journal of Pain. 1998; 14:40.
  16. Anand KJS. Hormonal and metabolic functions of neonates and infants undergoing surgery. Curr Opin Cardiol. 1986; 1:681-689. As written by T Blauer and D Gerstmann in their article, A simultaneous comparison of three neonatal pain scales during common NICU procedures. The Clinical Journal of Pain. 1998; 14:40.
  17. Anand KJS, Aynsley-Green A. Measuring the severity of surgical stress in newborn infants. J Pediatr Surg. 1988; 23:297-305. As written by T Blauer and D Gerstmann in their article, A simultaneous comparison of three neonatal pain scales during common NICU procedures. The Clinical Journal of Pain. 1998; 14:40.
  18. Anand KJS, Sippell WG, Aynsley-Green A. A randomized trial of fentanyl anesthesia in preterm babies undergoing surgery: effect on the stress response. Lancet. 1987; 1:243-248. As written by T Blauer and D Gerstmann in their article, A simultaneous comparison of three neonatal pain scales during common NICU procedures. The Clinical Journal of Pain. 1998; 14:40.

Doris K. Cope, M.D., is Clinical Director, Pain Evaluation and Treatment Institute, and Professor, Clinical Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
E-mail the author.

 


return to top


 


FEATURES

150 Years of Pediatric Anesthesia

ARTICLES


DEPARTMENTS


The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent or reflect the views, policies or actions of the American Society of Anesthesiologists.

NL Archives

Information for Authors