|
|
|
| |
The most
important contribution that anesthesiologists (and
ASA) can make toward providing an adequate supply
of high-quality AAs is to continue to take an active
leadership role in AA education — in the design
and administration of AA educational programs as well
as in the classroom and in their clinical practice
settings. Such “leadership by participation”
will grow to mirror anesthesiologist-led accomplishments
in clinical care, research and resident/fellow education.
As experts in the development of the medical specialty
of anesthesiology, anesthesiologists have stepped
forward during the last century to exert leadership
in many areas. Particularly, as the number of anesthesiologists
has increased, this leadership has been manifested
by new and refined medical and technical aspects of
clinical care that parallel our accomplishments in
clinical and basic research. As evident by the growing
number of anesthesiologists today, a priority has
been placed on both the quantity of programs and the
quality of education of the next generation.
What seems clear is that there will be a continuing
need to meet part of the clinical staffing needs across
the country by the utilization of the anesthesiologist-directed
anesthesia care team. This means there also must be
continued attention to the nature of anesthetist education.
Several questions arise concerning the recruitment
pool (e.g., level of relevant aptitudes, previous
education, etc.), what training should entail and,
of course, how anesthetists will be utilized in daily
practice to optimize the quality of anesthetic care
affordable to the public. Answers to these questions
in AA education have been sought using a “top
down” approach. It is most important to first
delineate the spectrum of practice conditions (e.g.,
what tasks are delegated to anesthetists and what
educational elements are needed to support an adequate
knowledge base and set of technical skills). The origin
and definition of such a “performance standard/specification”
is described by J. S. Gravenstein, M.D., and John
E. Steinhaus, M.D., in this edition of the NEWSLETTER
(page
5). The wisdom of the original
choices made 30 years ago with the founding of the
two existing anesthesiologist assistant (AA) programs
is an outstanding example of professional foresight
and physician leadership. It has been established
since then that recruiting at a high level from candidates
with a solid college education in premedical sciences
can provide qualified AAs. This is accomplished by
selecting top applicants who are qualified to do graduate
work in clinical medical science within AA programs
that are founded in an academic medical community
and are under the direction of well-trained anesthesiologists.
In a very practical way, anesthesiologists play a
vital role in this process. We could have conceivably
taken an “arm’s length” role, i.e.,
help a program get started and then turn over most
of the administration and teaching to the anesthetists
themselves. Or we could allow AAs to design and run
their own programs, producing graduates that we then
hire and manage after having little input into admission
criteria and curriculum design. In our opinion, the
outcome of the AA educational process has been successful
because anesthesiologists are directly involved in
the curriculum design, admissions criteria/process,
classroom education and clinical training. This could
be likened to the military training model whereby
the top military staff not only take responsibility
for the military academies (West Point, Annapolis,
etc.) but also for setting up the entire
training chain, from privates, corporals, sergeants
(our anesthesia technical personnel), through the
lieutenants and captains (our anesthetists), on up
to the higher officer levels (the physician level).
It is much more likely that the quality of the AA
thus educated will meet the needs defined by practicing
anesthesiologists. Furthermore, it is much more likely
that the attitude and spirit of cooperation at the
bedside in the operating room will be more conducive
to a cooperative “team effort” if there
is a bond of mutual respect forged in the total educational
process. This bond would gain strength not only due
to those fully trained anesthesiologists directing
the AA education but also by the constructive relationship
between AA students and residents who “grow
up” together in training rather than first meeting
each other in a later postgraduate clinical setting.
As summarized by Helmut Cascorbi, M.D., director of
the Case Western Reserve AA program for many years,
this can be an “imprinting” relationship
of considerable educational and managerial benefit
in later years.
As an additional positive feature of the goals originally
set by Dr. Gravenstein and Dr. Steinhaus, the educational
process modeled in the two existing AA programs has
allowed up to 10 percent of AA graduates to proceed
on to medical school (without having to double back
to acquire premedical courses) with the recommendation
and support of physicians with whom they have trained
and worked. Experience has shown that the large majority
of AAs entering medical school choose anesthesiology
as a specialty.
The physician’s role in AA practice does not
end with the graduation of the AA but continues into
the clinical arena where anesthesiologists provide
medical direction as defined by the “ASA Guidelines
for the Ethical Practice of Anesthesiology.”
There is no rule in any jurisdiction allowing the
independent practice of AAs or of practice of AAs
under the supervision of a nonanesthesiologist physician.
The AA works under the rules of the medical examining
board of each state either as defined in administrative
statute or under rules defining delegated care by
physicians. Individual AAs must obtain Medicare and
Medicaid provider numbers so that billing may be submitted
for their portion of the defined service under Medicare
Part B and the Medicaid rules of the state where they
are practicing. In addition, Medicare rules specify
that AAs must work under the medical direction of
an anesthesiologist. The actual practice conditions
of AAs are dependent on the specific policies of the
anesthesiology department where they are employed.
Use of anesthetic techniques, including the monitoring
of regional anesthesia and the insertion of monitoring
lines, is determined by the practice and judgment
of the medically directing anesthesiologist and applicable
departmental, hospital and state regulatory rules.
Depending on local hospital rules, AAs may or may
not be specifically credentialed by the hospital.
In all instances, however, their pattern of practice
is specified by the department of anesthesiology’s
policies and procedures, which are often approved
by the hospital’s physician medical board. Usually
the department determines the accuracy of the certification
status of AAs and keeps documentation of the education
completed on site as well as certification and recertification
by the National Commission for Certification of Anesthesiologist
Assistants (NCCAA). Recertification requires completion
of the NCCAA recertification examination every six
years.
The practice of medicine and anesthesiology is changing
rapidly. It is essential that the physicians whose
education is grounded in the knowledge of the pathophysiology,
assessment and treatment of disease guide the graduate
AA in the future practice of the anesthesia care team.
ASA has responded to this need not only by inclusion
of AAs in its care team policy statement for many
years but also by recently (2002) providing AAs with
the opportunity to obtain sponsored educational membership
in the Society. In addition, physicians who practice
with AAs or who have an interest in the education
of AAs should consider membership in the Association
for Anesthesiologist Assistant Education (AAAE).
In Summary:
Anesthesiologists are involved in the design of the
AA curriculum and, in particular, the criteria for
admission (level of educational background and at
what level of performance). These quality standards
are critical in determining the level at which the
anesthesia basic sciences can be taught as well as
the breadth and depth of clinical education (and ultimately
the quality of the AA contribution to the anesthesia
care team at the beside).
Anesthesiologists are involved in classroom experiences
(alongside qualified AA faculty and other medical
school faculty) in order to ensure the quality of
the basic science education. Of particular relevance
is involvement to ensure a complementary integration
of the basic AA knowledge base with the more extensive
medical education of anesthesiologists.
Anesthesiologists are involved directly in the clinical
education of AA students not only in terms of the
content of the facts and principles being conveyed
and emphasized but, perhaps more importantly, in establishing
the “mindset” of both student and teacher
as a model for future cooperation expected in later
clinical practice.
Anesthesiologists are involved directly in establishing
specific policies and protocols for the clinical practice
of AAs in an anesthesiology department. Only credentialed
anesthesiologists prescribe the specific anesthesia
care plan and provide the personal medical direction
of an AA in its implementation.
Anesthesiologists are involved in the continuing on-site
postgraduate guidance of AAs and sponsorship of their
access to ASA-developed medical educational materials
and conferences.
Anesthesiologists are involved in the continuing support
of the education and practice of AAs through the work
of AAAE <www.aaaehq.org>.
Given the long history and demonstrated success of
the AA profession in several states, the availability
of AAs will continue to expand. The key factor will
be to engage a growing number of anesthesiologists
in the ongoing support and utilization of AAs. Anesthesiologists
must contribute their LEADERSHIP THROUGH PARTICIPATION
in all aspects of AA education and practice.
| |
|
John F. Kreul, M.D., is Professor of Anesthesiology
and Associate Chair for Clinical Administration,
University of Wisconsin Medical School, University
of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics, Madison,
Wisconsin. He is a member of the Board of Directors
of AAAE. |
|
| |
|
Wesley
T. Frazier, M.D., is Associate Professor of
Anesthesiology, Emory University School of Medicine,
Atlanta, Georgia. |
|
|
return to top
|
|
|
|
|
FEATURES
Anesthesiologist Assistants
ARTICLES
DEPARTMENTS
The views expressed herein are those of the authors and
do not necessarily represent or reflect the views, policies
or actions of the American Society of Anesthesiologists.
NL Archives
Information for Authors
|
| |
|
|