| |
March 2003
Volume 67 |
Number 3 |
|
|
| Anesthesiologist
Assistants: A New Direction for the Anesthesia Care
Team Begins to Accelerate (Finally!) David
C. Mackey, M.D.
|
Most of
us are familiar with the concept of the anesthesiologist
assistant (AA), which was developed by J.S. Gravenstein,
M.D., and John E. Steinhaus, M.D., nearly 40 years
ago. Despite the merit of AAs as valued members of
the anesthesia care team, their national impact until
now has been underappreciated with fewer than 600
practicing in 16 states and only two AA schools in
existence. This situation now appears to be changing
with endorsement of the AA concept by the ASA leadership,
consideration of AA licensure by a number of additional
states and serious proposals for several additional
AA schools. For this reason, the pages of this NEWSLETTER
issue are dedicated to updating the ASA membership
with respect to AA education, certification, licensure
and practice.
Why, after approximately 30 years of dedicated practice
in relative obscurity, are AAs suddenly finding themselves
in the limelight? The answer is that AAs are finally
being recognized for the value they provide to the
anesthesia care team.
We are all acutely aware of the fact that there simply
are not enough physician extenders available to fill
the needs of anesthesia care team practices. This
shortage, exacerbated by the extender monopoly held
by nurse anesthetists, is handicapping hospital and
ambulatory surgical centers across the country. Also
at issue is the unceasing drive by the nurse anesthetists’
lobby for independent practice. For the safety of
our patients, we realize that physicians must remain
in charge of all aspects of medicine, including the
delivery of anesthesia care. Although most nurse anesthetists,
like most anesthesiologists, have as their pre-eminent
goal the provision of good clinical care for their
patients, the nurse anesthetists’ state and
national organizations all too often appear to be
fixated on the single issue of independent practice.
The resultant need to constantly battle the nurses’
“trade union” has been a major albatross
for our profession. And for many of us, the final
straw was the need for ASA to expend an enormous amount
of its scarce resources in response to the recent
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services proposal
to eliminate physician supervision of nurse anesthetists
in Medicare/Medicaid-supported facilities.
There is little wonder why so many anesthesiologists
are finally saying, enough! Imagine what
we could be doing to improve patient care if we could
instead channel our resources into organizations such
as the Anesthesia Patient Safety Foundation (APSF)
or the Foundation for Anesthesia Education and Research
(FAER). In re-examining the physician extender component
of the anesthesia care team, AAs come to the forefront.
AAs are educated by anesthesiologists in a medical
school environment, and many of us firmly believe
AAs are actually better trained than nurse anesthetists.
Historically, those AAs who want to practice as anesthesiologists
have gone to medical school instead of the state and
national legislatures for their career advancement.
The national emergence of the AA is long overdue.
It is time to work with well-trained physician extenders
who want to work with us and who are committed to
the anesthesia care team concept.
| |
|
David C. Mackey, M.D., is Clinical Associate
Professor of Anesthesiology, University of Florida,
Gainesville, Florida. |
|
|
return to top
|