2003 State Legislation and Regulations
S. Diane Turpin, J.D., Assistant
Director
Office of Governmental Affairs (State)
Most state legislatures have begun the 2003 session.
Few anesthesia-specific bills have been introduced
to date, but several are anticipated in this session.
A summary of notable legislative and regulatory activities
is included in this article, and further information
will be provided as these bills and others advance.
Anesthesiologist Assistants (AAs)
New Mexico — S.B. 73 would
amend the Anesthesiologist Assistant Act to allow
an anesthesiologist to supervise up to four anesthesiologist
assistants (AAs). Current law limits an anesthesiologist
to supervising only two AAs at a time except in emergency
situations. Current law also requires “enhanced
supervision” of AAs with less than one year
of experience. The Board of Medical Examiners recently
adopted regulations that require the supervising anesthesiologist
to submit a plan for enhanced supervision during the
first year of the AA’s practice. Missouri
— S.B. 300 and H.B. 390 would license
AAs to practice in Missouri. The bills require AAs
to practice under the supervision of an anesthesiologist
and set forth the scope of practice for AAs. Supervising
anesthesiologists must adopt a written practice protocol
delineating the services AAs may provide and the manner
in which AAs will be supervised.
Legislation to license AAs is expected to be introduced
in Florida and Louisiana.
Nurse Anesthetists
Hawaii — S.B. 792 and H.B.
613 provide that a physician or surgeon would have
no duty to supervise or direct any advanced practice
registered nurse (APRN) with whom the physician
or surgeon has collaborated or entered into a collegial
agreement. The bills also would prohibit any medical
malpractice insurer from imposing a surcharge or
otherwise discriminating against any physician or
surgeon for collaborating or entering into a collegial
agreement with an APRN. Nurse anesthetists are considered
a special category of APRNs.
Legislation addressing the scope of practice of
nurse anesthetists is expected to be introduced
in Missouri, Montana, New York, North Dakota
and Pennsylvania.
Office-Based Anesthesia
In New York, the appellate court upheld the lower
court’s decision that the Department of Health
did not have the legal authority to promulgate guidelines
for the office surgical setting. The lower court
had found that the guidelines were intended to be
standards to be applied in physician disciplinary
proceedings and would be evidence of local community
medical standards in medical malpractice actions.
In brief, the lower court held that the guidelines
were essentially regulations and such regulations
were beyond the scope of the department’s
authority, and the appellate court concurred. The
initial lawsuit was brought by the New York State
Association of Nurse Anesthetists.
Legislation may be introduced this session to give
the department the statutory authority to promulgate
regulations for the office-based surgical setting.
In January, the North Carolina
Medical Board adopted a position statement on office-based
surgical procedures. Physicians who perform surgical
or special procedures in an office requiring the
administration of anesthesia should be credentialed
to perform that procedure by a hospital, ambulatory
surgical facility or substantially comply with criteria
established by the Board. The guidelines provide
that a licensed physician with appropriate qualifications
takes responsibility for the supervision of all
aspects of the perioperative surgical, procedural
and anesthesia care delivered in the office setting.
Physicians should perform a preprocedure examination
and evaluation. The physician performing the procedure
should: ensure that an appropriate preanesthetic
examination and evaluation is performed; prescribe
the anesthetic unless the anesthesia is administered
by an anesthesiologist; ensure that qualified health
care professionals participate; remain physically
present during the intraoperative period and be
immediately available for diagnosis, treatment and
management of anesthesia-related complications or
emergencies; and ensure the provision of postanesthesia
care. The guidelines suggest that physicians who
perform Level II or Level III procedures should
be able to demonstrate substantial compliance with
the guidelines or should obtain accreditation by
an approved accrediting agency or organization within
one year of adoption.
The Alabama Board of Medical Examiners
has proposed guidelines for office-based surgery
and anesthesia. The guidelines in the current form
provide for a preanesthetic examination and evaluation
to be conducted by the physician who will be administering
or supervising the administration of anesthesia.
If a nurse anesthetist is to administer the anesthesia,
the physician must collaborate in the examination
and evaluation. Under the guidelines, anesthesia
should be administered only by licensed, qualified
and competent practitioners. Practitioners must
have documented competence and training to administer
anesthesia and to assist in any support or resuscitation
measures as required. Supervision of the “sedation/analgesia
component of the medical procedure” should
be provided by a physician who is physically present
(immediately and readily available), who is qualified
to supervise and who has accepted responsibility
for supervision. Reporting to the Board of Medical
Examiners is required within three business days
for all surgical-related deaths and all events that
resulted in an emergency transfer of the patient
to the hospital, anesthetic or surgical mishaps
requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation, unscheduled
hospitalization related to surgery and surgical-site
wound infection.
|