| The Committee
on Economics plays an important role in ASA’s
education and advocacy missions. The tasks of the
committee include reviewing and disseminating information
concerning the economics of the practice of anesthesiology,
reviewing private and government payment plans in
order to make recommendations to officers and the
House of Delegates concerning its findings and assisting
component societies on economic issues. Oversight
of the committee is provided by the Section on Professional
Practice Chair Eric W. Mason, M.D., and the Vice-President
for Professional Affairs Alexander A. Hannenberg,
M.D., the immediate past chair of the committee.
To carry out these tasks, the committee meets three
times each year and communicates electronically
on a daily basis. The committee is composed of six
members appointed to three-year terms and approximately
15 adjunct members appointed to one-year terms.
Members include representatives from private and
academic practices, “team” practices
and practices in which anesthesiologists personally
provide care and representatives of the Resident
Component. Staff support for the committee is provided
primarily through the ASA Washington Office. Karin
Bierstein, J.D, Assistant Director for Governmental
Affairs (Regulatory), and Sharon Merrick, ASA’s
coding and reimbursement analyst, are invaluable
in facilitating and coordinating the activities
of the committee.
One important function of the Committee on Economics
is developing codes by which anesthesia services
are reported. Anesthesia codes occupy the “zero”
series (i.e., 0xxxx) in Current Procedural Terminology™
(CPT), a publication of the American Medical Association
(AMA). There are approximately 270 anesthesia codes
that are used to report anesthesia services for
approximately 6,000 procedure codes. Very few of
the anesthesia codes are specific to a single surgical
procedure, and some “cross” to dozens,
if not more, procedure codes. (There are procedural
codes — those for invasive monitors, pain
management, critical care evaluation and management
— that also are used by anesthesiologists.)
Codes are developed in response to new technology,
and in the case of the codes for anesthesia for
obstetrics, for example, to allow for more accurate
and appropriate reporting of anesthesia services.
The CPT Editorial Panel oversees the code development
process and is assisted by representatives from
multiple specialty societies on the Advisory Committee.
Currently ASA is represented on the Advisory Committee
by H. Jay Przybylo, M.D. Also Stanley W. Stead,
M.D., is a member of the CPT Editorial Panel.
Once a code has been approved by the CPT Editorial
Panel, it must be given a value, a task performed
by the AMA Relative Value Update Committee (RUC).
ASA is represented at the RUC by Norman A. Cohen,
M.D., and Brenda S. Lewis, D.O.; James D. Grant,
M.D., serves as the RUC advisor from ASA. The RUC
valuation process is more political than the CPT
process in that code values translate into payment
for services, and the payment can potentially have
a “negative” impact on payment for all
other services. A component of the value assigned
to a code is that of practice expense; Neal H. Cohen,
M.D., represents ASA on this issue.
The RUC code valuation process depends on surveys
of physicians involved in performing those services,
and there is a minimum threshold of responses necessary
for the survey to be considered legitimate. The
surveys are usually targeted to ASA members who
are likely to provide the service in question and
have an understanding of the “service”
codes used for comparison. If a member receives
a request to participate in a survey, it is of tremendous
help to ASA if he or she completes the survey in
a timely manner; this is an opportunity for ASA
members to have direct input into the code valuation
processes.
The Committee on Economics’ most visible work
product is the ASA Relative Value Guide (RVG). This
publication is updated annually and reflects the
code development and revision processes and the
associated valuation process. The RVG follows the
CPT policy of not publishing a code until it has
been valued by the RUC. Also found in the RVG are
guidelines concerning the use of time in reporting
services as well as statements concerning monitored
anesthesia care (MAC), reporting of the insertion
intravascular catheterization procedures and transesophageal
echocardiography. These statements originated from
the committee and were adopted by the ASA House
of Delegates. The MAC statement in particular has
undergone two revisions since its inception. An
important change in the definition of MAC, approved
by the 2003 House, reads: “…if the patient
loses consciousness and the ability to respond purposefully,
the anesthetic is a general anesthetic, irrespective
of whether airway instrumentation is required.”
Another important ASA publication for which the
committee is responsible is the CROSSWALK™,
which links the appropriate anesthesia code (perhaps
with an acceptable alternate) to each procedural
code. This publication, also updated annually, is
overseen by the editor, Dr. Stead, along with Jan
Gillespie, M.D., Craig M. Johnson, M.D., Dr. Norman
Cohen and Ms. Merrick from the Washington Office.
It is recommended that the RVG be used along with
the CROSSWALK when deciding on the anesthesia code
that best describes the anesthesia service provided.
The 2005 RVG and CROSSWALK, in print or electronic
format, will be available from ASA headquarters
in Park Ridge, Illinois, in November 2004. This
is especially important for members to know, because
as of January 1, 2005, Health Insurance Portability
and Accountability Act regulations require that
only “current” codes will be accepted,
and there will be no grace period for transition
from “old” to “new” codes.
In order to understand and be responsive to the
economic concerns of anesthesiology subspecialty
areas, the committee has formal liaison relationships
with recognized anesthesiology subspecialty societies,
the academic anesthesiology community and the Anesthesia
Administrators Assembly.
ASA, through its Washington Office, has input to
the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
(CMS), and knowledgeable members of the committee
often participate in these discussions. The committee
helps to reality-test solutions to problems (notably
the rules of medical direction) as these are being
negotiated with CMS. On an ad hoc basis, the committee
communicates with the private payer community on
issues of interest to our specialty. As an example,
at a recent meeting of the committee, the medical
director of the Blue Cross/Blue Shield Association
of America made a presentation. An anesthesiologist
on the Aetna policy staff will attend the October
committee meeting.
Committee members, both individually and collectively,
along with Ms. Bierstein and Ms. Merrick, offer
guidance to members, their offices and billing services
on the appropriateness of coding and reporting services.
Unless the issue directly relates to an official
position of ASA, it is made clear that any opinion
offered should not be considered official ASA policy.
The opinions by no means always affirm the coding
and billing practice in question. If a provided
service does not appear to be medically necessary
(e.g., MAC for all endoscopic and pain
management procedures), the committee has not hesitated
to take a stand to support payment policies that
do not cover “universal MACs.” It must
be remembered that although there may be a code
describing a specific service, even if the service
is “medically necessary,” payers may
choose not to cover the service (i.e., insertion
of central venous catheter and pulmonary artery
catheter on same patient).
The Committee on Economics takes very seriously
its responsibility to advocate for the economic
interests of the ASA membership, and this advocacy
extends to the patients to whom we provide care.
Having a reasonable and rational methodology of
reporting our services helps put a visible face
on who we are and what we do, and that face is one
in which we should all take pride.
| |
|
James P. McMichael, M.D., is a partner at Capitol
Anesthesiology Association, Austin, Texas. |
|
|