Home >Newsletters >August 2004>From the Crow’s Nest
 
ASA NEWSLETTER
 
 
August 2004
Volume 68
Number 8

From The Crow's Nest


Douglas R. Bacon, M.D., Editor

Douglas R. Bacon, M.D., Editor




Painful Lessons


uring medical school, the one thing I learned was that I disliked afternoon sessions in clinic. The endless parade of patients while bouncing between examining rooms lacked the drama and urgency of the operating room (O.R.) or the intensive care unit. Listening to a long litany of chronic complaints or checking blood pressure, while important, lacked the sense of significance I found in more invasive work. Thus I approached my pain rotation during residency with some trepidation. What would I find? My unending fear was a long list of patients with complaints that could neither be cured nor helped. Residents in my senior year of training did not help as they told me of the horrors of the pain clinic.

Yet the rotation was wonderful. It began with the attending staff who ran the rotation. Young, energetic and a marvelous anesthesiologist and physician, Gerald Peer, M.D., had time for each resident and the patience to teach us the nuances of pain medicine. He was diplomatic in guiding our diagnoses and skillful in teaching us the regional anesthetic adjuvants that were and are so important to pain medicine. As we decided what to do in our third year of residency, it was a great temptation to spend more time in the pain clinic.

On my first job after residency, management of acute postoperative pain was a critical skill as we built an acute pain service. All of the anesthesiologists were expected to care for these patients when on call, and each of us took weekly turns running the service. I learned a great deal about education that first year and how important it is to see that all members of the team caring for a patient understand the plan. Patience was another virtue I slowly developed, trying hard to remember that the nurse who did not know how to restart an epidural infusion needed to be taught, not criticized.



“As an anesthesiologist interested in pain medicine but not formally trained in the subspecialty, I watch on the sidelines and wonder what is happening to this important part of anesthesiology.”




My next career stop was at a Veterans Administration hospital. There was a desire on the part of the hospital administration and the university chair with whom I worked to develop a pain medicine program. Resources were tight, and we could not hire any ancillary personnel to help with the service. Several of the anesthesiologists, myself included, saw chronic pain patients to try to help sort out those with treatable conditions from those who had other motivations for continuing to have pain. It was far from ideal.

In my most recent job, I have almost daily interactions with our excellent pain group. There is considerable crosstalk among the acute pain service and the anesthesiologist responsible for placing regional anesthetic blocks. At one of the hospitals in which I practice, an aggressive catheter service for lower extremity blocks has been developed, allowing patients with total hips and knees to ambulate better and have lower narcotic requirements. To watch them in practice is quite impressive.

Yet, recently, there was a movement afoot to have these anesthesiologists take only pain call and to leave O.R. call behind. While this is the national trend, it greatly saddened me. Anesthesiologists have been involved in pain medicine since the 1920s and have been leaders in the field for almost 85 years. Why is this separation occurring, and is it inevitable? Should “mainstream” anesthesiology be worried about this trend? A pain medicine colleague of mine recently expressed to me the opinion that there should be a certification for “interventional pain medicine” much the way there is for interventional radiology or cardiology. The field of interventional pain medicine would encompass blocks, spinal cord stimulators and like modalities and would be something unique to anesthesiologists. Interventional pain medicine would be consistent with anesthesiologists’ historic role in the field as well. While this is not a new idea, and it may be too late to implement, it is certainly a proposal that deserves action.

As an anesthesiologist interested in pain medicine but not formally trained in the subspecialty, I watch on the sidelines and wonder what is happening to this important part of anesthesiology. By establishing “pain only” call and spending more and more of their time in the pain clinic, O.R. anesthesiologists lose touch with their pain medicine colleagues. Having pain physicians in the O.R. environment is helpful, for they serve as a resource on many matters and also a reminder of another part of the mission of the anesthesiology department. Lacking an O.R. presence, like the highly successful basic science researcher, these physicians lose touch with their home specialty, and the specialty with them. It is always harder to look individuals in the eye and tell them they are not part of the department than it is to cut off a clinic outside the department.

As O.R.-based physicians, we need to be sensitive to the issues that surround our colleagues in the pain clinic. Their hours, while different from an O.R.-based practice, may, in fact, be longer. Issues of office space, which sound foreign to many in the O.R., are of crucial value to our pain colleagues. Getting the right equipment (such as fluoroscopy units) and finding O.R. time, not at the end of the day, but at a mutually convenient time, also is important. Salary and reimbursement issues may be different, and they may challenge conventional thinking.

In the end, we are all anesthesiologists regardless of the subspecialty we practice. As such it is our undertaking to eliminate pain whenever possible, either from the scalpel or other painful conditions. It is time for those of us in the O.R. to remember our colleagues in the pain clinic and value their expertise; and pain medicine physicians should understand that they are needed and supported in anesthesiology. Only then will we be able to begin to fulfill the promise unleashed in the 1840s in the United States — freedom from pain in modern anesthesia!

— D.R.B.


return to top


 

FEATURES

Pain Medicine


ARTICLES

DEPARTMENTS


The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent or reflect the views, policies or actions of the American Society of Anesthesiologists.

2004 NL Subject Index

2004 NL Author Index

NL Archives


Information for Authors