Home >Newsletters >January 2005>Washington Report
 
ASA NEWSLETTER
 
 
January 2005
Volume 69
Number 1

Washington Report


2005 Offers New Opportunities, Old Challenges for Incoming Director

Ronald Szabat, J.D., L.L.M., Director
Governmental and Legal Affairs



s I begin 2005 in my new position as Director of Governmental and Legal Affairs for ASA, I am struck by the rich combination of new opportunities and old challenges.

For instance, based on nearly 18 years of working for our federation partner, the American Medical Association (AMA), a familiar rhythm for part of the next year is already set. I am thinking, of course, of the cycle of national meetings where physician leaders from many state and national medical specialty societies come together to learn, discuss and set policy and be challenged to advance the overall profession of medicine.

Cleverly, ASA’s own cycle of important gatherings weaves in and around these other events, adding substantial depth for our own members. One need only look at the program book for the ASA Annual Meeting this past October to understand this in spades. The countless research presentations and continuing medical education offerings convened by ASA attract anesthesiologists from the four corners of America as well as those from around the globe.

Closer to the everyday demands of your ASA advocacy team, many weighty issues remain in 2005 that still require urgent action, whether it be in Washington or the states. Here in D.C., fixing the Medicare sustainable growth rate update formula to avoid a new round of cutbacks continues to rank high on every physician organization’s “to do” list for 2005. Given federal budget realities, this will not prove an easy campaign.

At the same time, the vexing need to achieve meaningful medical liability reform against runaway trial lawyers also must remain at the forefront of physicians’ legislative agendas. Again, this is a tough task, even with better overall support in the U.S. Senate this year, but it is hardly a new issue for physician organizations.

Both of these challenges will remain a major focus of ASA advocacy until they are accomplished. And, fortunately, our efforts will continue as we work cooperatively with like-minded coalition partners across all of organized medicine, led by AMA.

What is different about anesthesiology, though? How can our own grassroots anesthesiologists make a difference? Unfortunately the short space of this column does not permit the answer that is fully deserved, but please allow me to share one major initial impression and specific opportunity that I believe should guide much of our work together this year.

First and foremost, I believe anesthesiologists need to be better known for what they do and how they do it. Admittedly this is not an original thought, but in the world of public relations and political opinion that holds sway with our elected governmental leaders, the ability to translate and better explain what it is that anesthesiologists do is urgently needed. As part of my own education in this regard, I have recently visited and seen critical care anesthesia in medical practice in North Carolina. There, I also witnessed the excitement and elaborate work of a large hospital anesthesia care team, as I did in a major metropolitan hospital in Atlanta just prior to AMA’s Interim Meeting. In the coming months, I will visit a major academic training program as well as learn more, firsthand, about the ways in which anesthesiologists practice pain medicine and do research. Why? Well, certainly not to become expert in practicing anesthesiology! In fact, that is just the point.

Without years of hard work, medical education and actual clinical practice or research, there is simply no way that any layperson could hope to begin to fully understand the complexity of what a mere four or five days of anesthesiology “site visits” can offer, not to mention what happens on the other 360 days in any year. More to the point, unless we collectively can begin to translate and describe the intricacies of anesthesiology medical care so that public officials and their staffs can understand it more completely, it will be harder to win legislatively and with state and federal regulators. Outlining the distinctive markers of professionalism that are unique to anesthesiology is part of this need for better definition, but the fact remains that more and better “sound bites” also will be needed as we fight major legislative battles in the months to come. We are all competing for attention in an information age, which should never be confused with a newfound age of wisdom or knowledge.

Simple vignettes and stories can tell a lot and advance our cause. An excellent piece by George T. Blike, M.D., called “Human Factors Engineering: It’s All About ‘Usability’” from the October 2004 NEWSLETTER has great value far beyond its insightful predictions for the future of anesthesiology medical care. The straightforward questions asked in that piece by the promising anesthesiology medical resident working with Dr. Blike speak volumes about what needs to be learned, explained and re-explained to the lay public and public policy opinion leaders. In fact, in that same NEWSLETTER, Warren K. Eng, M.D., a resident at the University of North Carolina Hospitals, makes this same point, citing a well-written piece about anesthesiology and other “Hidden Specialties” in a widely read national periodical, U.S. News and World Report.

So, my new friends and colleagues, as you educate our decision-makers in government (and me), remember also to speak from your heart about what it is that you do to help patients on a daily basis. This is the “value-added” that each and every anesthesiologist can bring to ASA’s advocacy agenda as we work hard together to advance our unique issues. As I have told physician audiences for many years, no one can discount your personal medical stories, thoughtfully delivered.

If we truly want to prevail in achieving an enhanced Medicare anesthesia conversion factor, reverse the discriminatory anesthesia teaching rule and advance ourselves on numerous other issues, including quality of care, we will need to add the patient dimension to our repository of economic and practice management advocacy examples and arguments. Both our new President, Eugene P. Sinclair, M.D., and Immediate Past President Roger W. Litwiller, M.D., echoed this theme in their remarks before the ASA House of Delegates last October. Their words were wise and should be heeded. I have made it a New Year’s resolution to do so. May I boldly ask you to do the same?



return to top


 

FEATURES

2004 Annual Meeting


ARTICLES


DEPARTMENTS


The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent or reflect the views, policies or actions of the American Society of Anesthesiologists.

2004 NL Subject Index

2004 NL Author Index

NL Archives


Information for Authors