| ontinuous
peripheral nerve blockade, also called “perineural
local anesthetic infusion,” involves the percutaneous
insertion of a catheter directly adjacent to the
peripheral nerve(s) supplying a surgical site. Local
anesthetic is then infused via the catheter providing
site-specific analgesia. Originally the technique
was described in 1946 by Ansbro using a cork to
stabilize a needle placed adjacent to the brachial
plexus to provide a “continuous” supraclavicular
block.1
Subsequent technological advancements in needle
and catheter design allowed more mainstream use
of continuous blocks. For decades, however, patients
were required to remain hospitalized because the
available pumps used to infuse local anesthetic
were large, heavy and technically sophisticated.
It was not until 52 years after Ansbro’s first
report that outpatient perineural infusion
was described by Rawal et al. using a percutaneous
catheter and a small, lightweight, portable infusion
pump.2
The application of ambulatory perineural infusion
initially focused on providing this technique to
improve the postoperative experience of patients
already scheduled for outpatient surgery. Multiple
case reports and series of ambulatory perineural
infusion purporting improved outcomes were described
via catheters in various anatomic locations, including
paravertebral, interscalene, intersternocleidomastoid,
infraclavicular, axillary, psoas compartment, femoral,
fascia iliaca, sciatic/Labat, sciatic/popliteal
and tibial nerve placement. It was not until 2002,
however, that the first of four randomized, double-masked,
placebo-controlled studies provided prospective
evidence quantifying infusion benefits.3-6
Outpatient Benefits. In all of
these investigations, patients receiving perineural
local anesthetic achieved both clinically and statistically
significant lower resting and breakthrough pain
scores compared with those using exclusively oral
opioids for analgesia. In addition they required
dramatically fewer oral analgesics to achieve their
improved level of analgesia. Preoperatively subjects
scheduled for moderately painful procedures had
a perineural catheter placed: an infraclavicular
catheter for hand/forearm procedures,4
a popliteal catheter for foot/ankle surgeries3,5
or an interscalene catheter for shoulder procedures.6
Postoperatively patients received either perineural
local anesthetic or normal saline and were followed
at home for up to 60 hours. All patients were instructed
to use a bolus from their infusion pump for breakthrough
pain and oral analgesics if this maneuver failed.
In patients with an interscalene catheter following
shoulder surgery, the local anesthetic infusion
provided analgesia so that 80 percent of patients
receiving ropivacaine required one or fewer opioid
tablets per day during their infusion and reported
average resting pain as less than 1.5 on a scale
of 0-10.6
Conversely all patients receiving placebo required
four or more opioid tablets per day, beginning the
evening of surgery, and reported average resting
pain scores between 3 and 4. For breakthrough pain,
the differences between treatment groups were even
more pronounced in all of these four placebo-controlled
studies.
Additional benefits related to improved analgesia
were experienced by patients who received perineural
local anesthetic. Of patients receiving perineural
ropivacaine, 0 percent to 30 percent reported insomnia
due to pain compared with 60 percent to 70 percent
of patients receiving placebo.4-6
Additionally, awakenings from sleep because of pain
averaged 0.0-0.2 times on the first postoperative
night compared with 2.0-2.3 times for patients using
only oral opioids.4-6
Using fewer opioid tablets was associated with a
lower rate of nausea, vomiting, pruritis and sedation.3-6
Satisfaction with postoperative analgesia was both
clinically and statistically higher for patients
receiving local anesthetic.3-6
Early Hospital Dismissal. The possibility
of using ambulatory perineural infusion to allow
earlier discharge of inpatients who require potent
analgesia has only recently been explored.3
For example criteria for home discharge following
knee and hip arthroplasty usually include the requirements
that 1) pain is controlled with only oral analgesics
and that 2) patients must ambulate at least 30 meters
so they may function at home. Consequently the median
duration of hospitalization following both of these
procedures in the United States is five days. Using
ambulatory perineural femoral or lumbar plexus infusion,
patients have been discharged home after a single
night of hospitalization following total hip and
knee replacement.7
Additionally total elbow and shoulder replacement
have been converted into outpatient procedures.8
The potential benefits to individuals include a
decreased risk of nosocomial infection and accidental
medical error and improved patient analgesia and
quality of life. The potential societal cost savings
are enormous, with more than 500,000 knee and hip
replacements performed annually at a cost of more
than $12 billion in the United States alone. These
practices, however, have only been recently investigated.
Significantly more data are required to define the
appropriate subset of patients and assess the benefits
and associated incidence of complications.
Additional Applications. Ambulatory
continuous peripheral nerve blocks have been described
for battlefield management as well as international
transport following combat injury in Iraq.9
Although a control group was not included, a small
series of children with complex regional pain syndrome
I experienced complete resolution of their symptoms
two months following a Bier block and 96 hours of
outpatient perineural local anesthetic infusion.10
As a result of the relatively recent evolution of
outpatient continuous peripheral nerve blocks, illuminating
data on many aspects of this analgesic technique
are unavailable. In keeping with evidence-based
medical practice, we believe the optimal techniques,
equipment and patient oversight should be determined
by prospective, controlled trials and not merely
by institutional preference. Future investigation
should include identification of which patients
and procedures benefit most from perineural infusion;
optimal local anesthetic type, concentration and
adjutants; the most advantageous delivery regimen
and dosing structure; the optimal catheters (e.g.,
stimulating versus nonstimulating catheters), placement
techniques and infusion pumps; the safest frequency
of patient contact and method of catheter removal;
and, lastly, whether additional outcomes are affected
with ambulatory perineural local anesthetic infusion
(e.g., health-related quality of life).
References:
1. Ansbro FP. A method of continuous brachial plexus
block. Am J Surg. 1946; 71:716-722.
2. Rawal N, Axelsson K, Hylander J, Allvin R, et
al. Postoperative patient-controlled local anesthetic
administration at home. Anesth Analg. 1998;
86:86-89.
3. White PF, Issioui T, Skrivanek GD, et al. The
use of a continuous popliteal sciatic nerve block
after surgery involving the foot and ankle: Does
it improve the quality of recovery? Anesth Analg.
2003; 97:1303-1309.
4. Ilfeld BM, Morey TE, Enneking FK. Continuous
infraclavicular brachial plexus block for postoperative
pain control at home: A randomized, double-blinded,
placebo-controlled study. Anesthesiology.
2002; 96:1297-1304.
5. Ilfeld BM, Morey TE, Wang RD, Enneking FK. Continuous
popliteal sciatic nerve block for postoperative
pain control at home: A randomized, double-blinded,
placebo-controlled study. Anesthesiology.
2002; 97:959-965.
6. Ilfeld BM, Morey TE, Wright TW, Chidgey LK, Enneking
FK. Continuous interscalene brachial plexus block
for postoperative pain control at home: A randomized,
double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. Anesth
Analg. 2003; 96:1089-1095.
7. Ilfeld BM, Gearen PF, Enneking FK, et al. Total
knee arthroplasty as a 23-hour stay procedure using
ambulatory perineural local anesthetic infusion:
A prospective feasibility study, abstracted. Reg
Anesth Pain Med. 2005; In press.
8. Ilfeld, BM, Wright, TW, Enneking, FK. Total shoulder
arthroplasty as an outpatient procedure using ambulatory
perineural local anesthetic infusion: A prospective
feasibility study, abstracted. Reg Anesth Pain
Med. 2005; In press.
9. Buckenmaier CC, McKnight GM, Winkley JV, et al.
Continuous peripheral nerve block for battlefield
anesthesia and evacuation. Reg Anesth Pain Med.
2005; 30:202-205.
10. Dadure C, Motais F, Ricard C, et al. Continuous
peripheral nerve blocks at home for treatment of
recurrent complex regional pain syndrome I in children.
Anesthesiology. 2005; 102:387-391.
| |
|
Brian M. Ilfeld, M.D., is Assistant Professor
of Anesthesiology, University of Florida, Gainesville,
Florida. |
|
| |
|
F. Kayser Enneking, M.D., is Professor of Anesthesiology
and Orthopedics, University of Florida, Gainesville,
Florida. |
|
|