| Perioperative
Respiratory Strategies for Morbidly Obese Patients
Juraj Sprung,
M.D., Ph.D..
orbid
obesity (MO) is associated with marked respiratory
comorbidities such as restrictive lung disease,
obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and/or pulmonary hypertension.
During anesthesia these patients experience large
alveolar-to-arterial oxygen gradients requiring
higher inspiratory oxygen concentrations to maintain
adequate arterial oxygenation (PaO2)
compared to normal-weight patients. All these issues
may pose a significant challenge for the anesthesiologist.
Approximately 10 percent of MO patients suffer from
hypoventilation syndrome,1
while more than 50 percent have moderate to severe
sleep apnea.2
Intraoperative use of opioids in these patients
may be associated with excessive postoperative respiratory
depression. Almost intuitively the use of shorter-acting
anesthetics, narcotics or regional techniques would
be a desirable approach. A recent prospective, randomized
study demonstrated that MO adult patients who underwent
major abdominal surgery awoke significantly faster
and had higher SpO2 on entry to the postanesthesia
care unit after desflurane than after sevoflurane
anesthesia.3
Theoretical advantages of using anesthetics with
shorter pharmacokinetics properties on postoperative
outcomes in MO patients, however, will require more
formal studies.
Alternatives to narcotics, such as a2-agonists,
have been used for sedation during awake fiberoptic
intubation, and because these drugs are free of
significant effects on respiratory function, they
may be used during the course of anesthesia in MO
patients, especially of those who suffer from OSA.
An a2-agonist, dexmedetomidine, with sedative/hypnotic,
anesthetic-sparing, analgesic and sympatholytic
properties, has been approved for sedation in the
intensive care unit; however, its role in intraoperative
anesthesia practice has not yet been established,
although sporadic case reports are being published
that suggest its potential usefulness.4
Whether tracheal intubation is more difficult in
obese patients is debatable. Juvin et al.5
report a difficult intubation rate of 15.5 percent
in obese patients and 2.2 percent in lean patients.
None of the risk factors for difficult intubation
described in the lean population was satisfactory
in obese patients. At the same time, Brodsky et
al.6
found that neither obesity nor body mass index predicted
problems with tracheal intubation. A high Mallampati
score and large neck circumference, however, may
increase the potential for difficult laryngoscopy
and intubation. A conservative approach is to do
fiberoptic intubation in all “questionable
airway cases” or after assessment is made
that mask ventilation may be difficult providing
intubation fails. Having an array of alternative
intubating devices readily available (intubating
laryngeal mask airway, Bullard Scope, WU Scope,
etc.) and an anesthesiologist who is proficient
in these less-utilized techniques also makes the
decision upon method of tracheal intubation in these
patients easier.
Another challenge for anesthesia in MO patients
may be intraoperative maintenance of PaO2.
MO patients during anesthesia and paralysis experience
a larger reduction in lung volume than the normal-weight
patients, and this parallels more severe impairment
of gas exchange.7-8
Once atelectasis has developed, using of positive
end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) may not be sufficient
to re-expand the atelectasis. Over the last several
decades, different strategies were used to re-expand
collapsed lungs during anesthesia in order to “optimize”
oxygenation.
Strategy 1: Large tidal volume.
By using large tidal volume ventilation, the mean
lung volume is intermittently increased above closing
volume, which may, at least theoretically, improve
PaO2.9
Others10
demonstrated, however, that the strategy of using
tidal volumes between 15 and 20 mL/kg ideal body
weight has little or no beneficial effect on oxygenation
in MO patients. It is possible that due to the intermittent
nature of lung inflation despite use of high tidal
volume, the collapsed alveolar units did not reopen.
Strategy 2: Use of PEEP. Isolated
effects of PEEP on PaO2 during mechanical
ventilation in either morbidly obese or normal-weight
patients either has no beneficial effect11 or just
slightly improves the PaO2.7
Its routine use is therefore not recommended. Application
of PEEP early during induction of general anesthesia
and before atelectasis develops prevents atelectasis
and improves oxygenation in MO patients.12
Strategy 3: Alveolar recruitment maneuver.
The physiologic background of the alveolar recruitment
strategy lies in the fact that initial pressure
needed to open collapsed alveoli during anesthesia
is high;13
an “opening pressure” of at least 40
cm H2O is needed to fully reverse anesthesia-induced
collapse of healthy lungs in normal-weight patients.14-17
In order to re-expand atelectatic lungs, three conditions
need to be met: 1) insufflation pressure needs to
exceed alveolar “opening pressure,”
2) pressure needs to be sustained as alveoli may
not re-open by using intermittent pressure and 3)
open recruitment needs to be followed by higher
PEEP in order to maintain alveolar units.13
The recruitment maneuver has now been studied in
MO patients by our group (unpublished data). Since
MO patients have low respiratory system compliance,8-18
we use higher than usual recruitment pressures achieved
by stepwise increase in PEEP up to 20 cm H2O,
but at the same time, limiting maximum peak inspiratory
pressure to 50 cm H2O. Upon achievement
of expected PaO2, the lungs are ventilated
with lower tidal volumes at 12 cmH2O
of PEEP. This technique appears promising in maintaining
excellent intraoperative PaO2.
Upon awakening from anesthesia, tracheal extubation
needs to be performed after reaching satisfactory
criteria for extubation and after the patient is
“fully awake and cooperative.” Regardless
of when or which nondepolarizing muscle relaxant
was used, a full dose of reversal must always be
given. In order to prevent atelectasis in the supine
position, we may consider conducting tracheal extubation
once the patients are in a semi-sitting position
after they are transferred from the operating room
table to their hospital bed. In order to prevent
development of immediate postextubation hypoxia,
uninterrupted administration of oxygen must be continued.
Because of the fact that, in most of these patients,
oxygenation during sleep (and especially after anesthesia)
may be dependent on use of continuous positive airway
pressure (CPAP) or bi-level positive airway pressure
(Bi-PAP) devices, they should be considered soon
after tracheal extubation. During monitored anesthesia
care with sedation, one may consider using either
CPAP or Bi-PAP instead of nasal cannula. Furthermore
patients’ transport to the recovery room should
be continuously monitored with pulse oximetry. Based
on preoperative conditions and immediate postextubation
assessment of respiratory risk, some of these patients
may require admission to a telemetry unit for overnight
respiratory observation.
Pulmonary embolism is a rare but devastating event.
In patients who die after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass,
clinically only 20 percent of patients were suspected
to have pulmonary emboli; yet at autopsy, 80 percent
of patients had pulmonary emboli. Therefore these
patients have an unexpectedly high rate of clinically
silent pulmonary emboli contributing to morbidity
and mortality. Full measures of thromboprophylaxis
is mandatory in this patient population.19
Duggan et al.20
have demonstrated in animal models that intraoperative
atelectasis may increase pulmonary vascular permeability
and that the recruitment maneuvers successfully
prevent lung injury associated with hypoxemia caused
by protracted atelectasis. While newer lung recruitment
strategies — emerging for intraoperative respiratory
management of MO patients — efficiently improve
intraoperative oxygenation, it remains to be seen
if they can improve outcomes and reduce postoperative
pulmonary complications. Also more studies are needed
to show if the use of shorter-acting anesthetics,
narcotics or even neuraxial blockade can reduce
postoperative respiratory risks in MO patients.
References:
1. Sugerman HJ. Pulmonary function in morbid obesity.
Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 1987; 16:225-237.
2. Resta O, Foschino-Barbaro MP, Legari G, et al.
Sleep-related breathing disorders, loud snoring
and excessive daytime sleepiness in obese subjects.
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2001; 25:669-675.
3. Strum EM, Szenohradszki J, Kaufman WA, et al.
Emergence and recovery characteristics of desflurane
versus sevoflurane in morbidly obese adult surgical
patients: A prospective, randomized study. Anesth
Analg. 2004; 99:1848-1853.
4. Hofer RE, Sprung J, Sarr MG, Wedel DJ. Anesthesia
for a patient with morbid obesity using dexmedetomidine
without narcotics: [L'anesthesie chez un patient
obese morbide avec la dexmedetomidine sans narcotiques].
Can J Anaesth. 2005; 52:176-180.
5. Juvin P, Lavaut E, Dupont H, et al. Difficult
tracheal intubation is more common in obese than
in lean patients. Anesth Analg. 2003; 97:595-600.
6. Brodsky JB, Lemmens HJ, Brock-Utne JG, et al.
Morbid obesity and tracheal intubation. Anesth
Analg. 2002; 94:732-736.
7. Pelosi P, Ravagnan I, Giurati G, et al. Positive
end-expiratory pressure improves respiratory function
in obese but not in normal subjects during anesthesia
and paralysis. Anesthesiology. 1999; 91:1221-1231.
8. Sprung J, Whalley D, Falcone T. The effects of
tidal volume and respiratory rate on oxygenation
and respiratory mechanics during laparoscopy in
morbidly obese patients. Anesthesia Analgesia.
2003; 97:268-274.
9. Visick WD, Fairley HB, Hickey RF. The effects
of tidal volume and end-expiratory pressure on pulmonary
gas exchange during anesthesia. Anesthesiology.
1973; 39:285-290.
10. Bardoczky GI, Yernault JC, Houben JJ, d'Hollander
AA. Large tidal volume ventilation does not improve
oxygenation in morbidly obese patients during anesthesia.
Anesth Analg. 1995; 81:385-388.
11. Salem MR, Dalal FY, Zygmunt MP, et al. Does
PEEP improve intraoperative arterial oxygenation
in grossly obese patients? Anesthesiology.
1978; 48:280-281.
12. Coussa M, Proietti S, Schnyder P, et al. Prevention
of atelectasis formation during the induction of
general anesthesia in morbidly obese patients. Anesth
Analg. 2004; 98:1491-1495.
13. Lachmann B. Open up the lung and keep the lung
open. Intensive Care Med. 1992; 18:319-321.
14. Rothen HU, Sporre B, Engberg G, et al. Re-expansion
of atelectasis during general anaesthesia: A computed
tomography study. Br J Anaesth. 1993; 71:788-795.
15. Rothen HU, Sporre B, Engberg G, et al. Reexpansion
of atelectasis during general anaesthesia may have
a prolonged effect. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand.
1995; 39:118-125.
16. Rothen HU, Sporre B, Engberg G, et al. Prevention
of atelectasis during general anaesthesia. Lancet.
1995; 345:1387-1391.
17. Rothen HU, Sporre B, Engberg G, et al. Atelectasis
and pulmonary shunting during induction of general
anaesthesia — Can they be avoided? Acta
Anaesthesiol Scand. 1996; 40:524-529.
18. Sprung J, Whalley DG, Falcone T, et al. The
impact of morbid obesity, pneumoperitoneum, and
posture on respiratory system mechanics and oxygenation
during laparoscopy. Anesth Analg. 2002;
94:1345-1350.
19. Melinek J, Livingston E, Cortina G, Fishbein
MC. Autopsy findings following gastric bypass surgery
for morbid obesity. Arch Pathol Lab Med.
2002; 126:1091-1095.
20. Duggan M, McCaul CL, McNamara PJ, et al. Atelectasis
causes vascular leak and lethal right ventricular
failure in uninjured rat lungs. Am J Respir
Crit Care Med. 2003; 27:27.
| |
|
Juraj
Sprung, M.D., Ph.D., is Professor of Anesthesiology,
Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester,
Minnesota. |
|
|