| ASCCA:
A Defining Role in Future Improved Outcomes
Stephen O. Heard, M.D., President
American Society of Critical Care Anesthesiologists
he
American Society of Critical Care Anesthesiologists
(ASCCA) is a subspecialty organization of ASA whose
mission is to preserve and expand the pivotal role
of critical care medicine as practiced by intensivists
in critical care units within the scope of practice
of anesthesiology. These goals will be accomplished
through education and advocacy.1
Why is critical care medicine important to the individual
anesthesiologist? I will offer a few significant
reasons. First, critical care has long been a vital
component of anesthesiology. Second, considering
patient safety is an integral part of the practice
of anesthesiology, it is noteworthy that studies,
many of which were published by anesthesia intensivists,
indicate high-intensity staffing of intensive care
units by intensivists improves patient outcome.2
Third, an analysis by the ASA Task Force on Future
Paradigms of Anesthesia Practice suggests that demand
for anesthesiologists in the operating room will
decrease over time. Moreover, analyses by other
organizations predict there will be a shortage of
critical care practitioners by as early as 2010.3
ASCCA believes the specialty of anesthesiology should
be poised to respond to this shortfall of quality
physicians.
Recent proposed changes in the curriculum for anesthesiology
residents allow residents more exposure to critical
care over four years in a graded fashion. This may
increase the interest in critical care as a career
choice. Other proposals such as dual certification
in anesthesiology and critical care medicine at
the end of an anesthesiology residency might also
increase the number of critical care providers.
Even with dramatic increases in anesthesia-based
intensivists and intensivists from other specialties,
the projected shortfall will not be alleviated.
A recent paper proposes that accreditation bodies
work cooperatively to enable a pathway for emergency
medicine physicians who have completed a critical
care medicine fellowship4
to obtain certification. Other proposals include
common standards for intensive care unit care, information
technology and monetary incentives.5 Lastly, members
of ASCCA are serving on a Society of Critical Care
Medicine task force to examine the future of critical
care as a specialty. Scenarios being explored include
the establishment of a common critical care board
examination that all specialties would use, a standard
critical care curriculum, although each specialty
would still have individual fellowships, and critical
care medicine as a distinct and separate specialty.
There are, however, threats from other specialties
whose members seek to expand their purview despite
lack of proper training in critical care medicine
— most notably hospitalists.6
ASCCA and its members have been working on several
other important issues.
Pay for Performance
In collaboration with providers, hospitals and other
stakeholders, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services (CMS) is in the process of developing pay-for-performance
(P4P) initiatives. With these initiatives, physicians
who meet or exceed performance standards would receive
a bonus payment over and above the base compensation.
P4P will be coming to anesthesiology and critical
care. As intensivists we must be prepared to drive
the process to ensure quality patient care and fairness
in physician reimbursement. A recent informal survey
of other critical care professional organizations
showed that, to date, little has been done to develop
initiatives. Under the energetic leadership of Gerald
A. Maccioli, M.D. (ASCCA President-Elect and Chair
of the ASA Committee on Critical Care Medicine)
and other members of ASCCA, an initial set of critical
care medicine P4P initiatives has been formulated:
1) prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infections,
2) prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia
and 3) daily interruption of sedation for patients
being mechanically ventilated. Working with the
ASA Committee on Performance and Outcomes Measurement,
ASCCA liaison to the Critical Care Workgroup Todd
Dorman, M.D., will represent ASCCA as the leading
critical care professional organization in the development
of P4P initiatives. The additional challenge for
us will be to ensure that P4P is a bonus system
with new money injected into the Medicare system,
and not a pay cut.
Organ Donation
Several years ago, the Health Resources and Services
Administration of the federal government formed
an Organ Donation Breakthrough Collaborative seeking
to bring the best practices of hospitals where organ
donation rates were high to institutions with lower
rates. The overall goal of the collaboration was
to increase the conversion rate (actual donors/potential
donors) to 75 percent nationwide. Members of ASCCA
continue to be a vital part of this collaborative
endeavor. More information may be found at <organdonation.iqsolutions.com>.
In April of this year, the United Network for Organ
Sharing sponsored a national Donation after Cardiac
Death (DCD) Consensus Conference. ASCCA member Stanley
H. Rosenbaum, M.D., and Stephen O. Heard, M.D.,
chaired a group that included ASA members Susan
K. Palmer, M.D., and Gail A. Van Norman, M.D. Examined
issues included: 1) medical criteria to predict
DCD candidacy following withdrawal of life support,
2) use of transplant-related interventions and medications
during withdrawal of treatment and before declaration
of death and 3) criteria that predict cardiac death
after withdrawal of treatment. A summary report
will be published in the near future.
References:
1. The American Society of Critical Care Anesthesiologists
<www.ascca.org>.
Accessed on October 5, 2005.
2. Hanson CW III, Durbin CG Jr, Maccioli GA, et
al. The anesthesiologist in critical care medicine:
Past, present and future. Anesthesiology.
2001; 95(3):781-788.
3. Angus DC, Kelley MA, Schmitz RJ, White A, Popovich
J Jr, Caring for the critically ill patient. Current
and projected workforce requirements for care of
the critically ill and patients with pulmonary disease:
Can we meet the requirements of an aging population?
JAMA. 2000; 284(21):2762-2770.
4. Huang DT, Osborn TM, Gunnerson KJ, et al. Critical
care medicine training and certification for emergency
physicians. Ann Emerg Med. 2005; 46(3):217-223.
5. Kelley MA, Angus D, Chalfin DB, et al. The critical
care crisis in the United States: A report from
the profession. Chest. 2004; 125(4):1514-1517.
6. Pham HH, Devers KJ, Kuo S, Berenson R. Health
care market trends and the evolution of hospitalist
use and roles. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;
20(2):101-107.
| |
|
Stephen
O. Heard, M.D., is Professor and Chair, Department
of Anesthesiology, UMass Memorial Medical Center
and University of Massachusetts Medical School,
Worcester. |
|
|