Home     |    Contact ASA     |     Join ASA!    |     Members Only     |    Retail Store   |    Advertising Information
 
ASA NEWSLETTER
 
 
June 2006
Volume 70
Number 6

Practice Management


What’s Wrong With Your Anesthesiology Group Retirement Plan?


Karin Bierstein, J.D.
Associate Director of Professional Affairs



This article is available in PDF format.



he corporate responsibilities of anesthesiology groups’ management are a new topic for the “Practice Management” column. Among them, not infrequently, is retirement plan administration. The plan administrator is a fiduciary whom the law holds to certain standards, including due diligence in selecting plan advisors. Jeff Seymour, Managing Director of Triangle Wealth Management, L.L.C. in Cary, North Carolina, offers the cautionary information and suggestions below.

Overview
Both anesthesiology practice administrators and physician owners commonly serve as retirement plan administrators for their groups. As such, they must ensure that they select competent and independent plan advisors. Sometimes plan administrators rely too heavily on the advisor (or more often, broker) to provide full disclosure of their own interests in investments held by the plan. This can lead to a breach of the plan administrator’s fiduciary duties. This article will help the retirement plan administrator become better informed on issues regarding disclosure of conflicts of interest. Recall that under the Employee Retirement Income and Security Act (ERISA), a plan sponsor and plan administrator must not only identify conflicts of interest, they must avoid them.

On the Watch List

Hidden fees: Do any of the plan mutual funds have 12b-1 fees? If so the advisor may have a potential conflict of interest and a reduced ability to assume a fiduciary role. You should ask your advisor why you have funds with 12b-1 fees. These are ongoing fees paid by the mutual fund company to a brokerage for marketing the fund. When the 12b-1 fee was introduced by the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) in 1980, it was supposed to help mutual fund companies pay for advertising in order to grow their funds so that some economies of scale could lower the ongoing management costs. We have seen that many of the funds charging 12b-1 fees have grown considerably in size, but we frequently do not see a corresponding reduction in the size of the 12b-1 fee. Alternatively, witness the existence of thousands of no-load funds (with no 12b-1 fees either). Clearly 12b-1 fees are not necessary, and clearly they do nothing to help the investor. For this reason, the SEC considered repealing 12b-1 fees in 2004. A bill was introduced — the Mutual Fund Reform Act of 2004 — providing for the repeal of rule 12b-1, but it did not pass.

As an investor, you should know that once a broker sells a mutual fund with a 12b-1 fee, it continues to receive 12b-1 fees annually, as long as the fund is held. Over the years, this will have an impact on returns because you are charged the 12b-1 fee directly by the mutual fund company. Make sure you include the 12b-1 fee in your comparisons of mutual funds — or better still, avoid mutual funds with 12b-1 fees, since there is no evidence to support the claim that funds with 12b-1 fees produce higher returns. Similar issues affect mutual funds with class A, B or C, which means that the plan participants are paying sales loads (commissions) without necessarily performing better than or as well as no-load funds.

Setting yourself up to pay a higher tax rate:
Both physician leaders and professional practice managers may have great breadth and depth of business knowledge, but they are probably not tax experts. The plan administrator does need to be mindful of some basic tax considerations for retirement plans, and to hire an advisor to educate the plan participants about the impact of tax planning on the investments in their plan. Here is a rudimentary fact that is often overlooked: federal personal income tax rates on long-term capital gains, and on dividends, are only 15 percent. Yet the same investments (those that are equity-based, i.e., stocks and mutual funds holding stocks) held inside your company retirement plan will be taxed at personal income tax rates when withdrawn. Most anesthesiologists are in the 33-percent federal personal income tax bracket or higher. Would you rather pay 33 percent or 15 percent in taxes?

Some would reject this argument because the purpose of the retirement plan is to defer income tax to the future, when personal tax rates are assumed to be lower. Good point. Now consider this: If the anesthesiologist is planning on living comfortably in retirement, he or she is still going to be drawing enough from his or her retirement plan to pay more tax than 15 percent. In addition, the current status of the nation’s fiscal situation (ballooning debt, aging population, plummeting national savings rate, lowest personal income tax structure in decades, Medicare and Social Security solvency crises in 2018 and 2040, respectively, according to the trustees’ May 2006 report) mean there is considerable chance we will see higher marginal income tax rates in the future. We are not saying that you should not hold any equities in your retirement plan (read: deferred savings plan), but you need to be aware of the tax implications of your asset allocation decisions. Certainly your advisor needs to educate plan members about this and other facts.

Preferred funds:
Ask your advisors if they or their company receive any remuneration in any form (trips to Maui, BMWs and Rolexes, etc.) from fund companies. There are brokerages that have charged mutual fund companies for the privilege of being called a preferred fund company. This status may lead to improved access to the sales force (brokers). Failure to disclose this or any similar arrangement leads to a clear conflict of interest. One national brokerage actually made most of the firm’s annual profits from these undisclosed fees alone in 2005.

Trading costs:
When a plan participant sells mutual fund shares (redeems them back to the fund company), that participant does not directly incur a fee/cost for the trades required to sell the stocks that make up the fund. Instead the remaining fundholders pay. In this manner, any short-term trading of the fund hurts returns of the long-term fundholders. For mutual funds with high turnover (a great deal of buying and selling), fundholders may see up to 1 percent of the value of the fund lost annually to trading costs. Trading costs are not disclosed in the fund prospectus, so the investor cannot know in advance what will be lost to trading costs. The plan administrator may, however, ask for the “Statement of Additional Information” (SAI). Sometimes the SAI will disclose trading costs for the fund in a previous year. Look for funds with trading costs as low as possible, ideally less than 0.4 percent of the fund’s value per year. This should be something your advisor analyzes and discusses with you.

Broker or advisor:
You must know whether the persons you are working with at the investment firm are brokers or advisors. Ask them to disclose their role in writing. Brokers will vehemently deny any fiduciary responsibility among themselves, but some have been known to muddy the specific nature of their role when they are in front of clients. The Financial Planning Association has brought suit against the SEC for allowing Merrill Lynch to continue to call its brokers “advisors.” A Registered Investment Advisor is an individual licensed to provide investment advice, and advisors have a legal obligation to act in the best interest of their client (1940 Investment Advisor Act). Brokers do not.

Other sources of conflict:
ERISA requires that you have an advisor that is independent and will validate the product providers’ (mutual funds companies’) performance results. This means your advisor must not be in any way affiliated with the mutual fund companies represented in the plan (unless you hire a separate independent advisor).

If the advisor recommends products that are proprietary, you need to understand the implications for your fiduciary role. We recommend avoiding proprietary products because they serve to lock in the client by preventing them from transferring those assets elsewhere.

Plan sponsors and plan administrators must not accept services that are not offered to all participants. The most obvious example of this clear ERISA violation is the offer of a free personal retirement plan analysis for the anesthesiology practice owners, but not for other practice employees.

Conclusion

Many of the above potential problem areas for retirement plan administrators are not disclosed very well — but they should be. The securities industry is under fire from regulators (Spitzer, et al.) in part because of poor disclosure and in part for failure to perform the role of fiduciary. One hopes that the pressure to reform and provide improved transparency will continue.

Jeff Seymour may be contacted through Triangle Wealth Management’s Web site at <www.doctorwealth.com> or by calling (919) 469-3600.




return to top


 

FEATURES

Professional Liability: 2006 — A Year of Stability


ARTICLES

DEPARTMENTS


The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent or reflect the views, policies or actions of the American Society of Anesthesiologists.

2005 NL Subject Index

2005 NL Author Index

NL Archives

Information for Authors