| Louisiana
Court Rules on Conflicts Between Nursing and Medical
Board Opinions
Lisa Percy, J.D., Manager
State Legislative and Regulatory Affairs
s
reported in March, <www.ASAhq.org/Newsletters/2006/03-06/stateBeat3_06.html>,
the Louisiana State Board of Nursing
unanimously adopted an Advisory Opinion that authorizes
a nurse anesthetist to perform pain management procedures.
A nurse anesthetist had petitioned the nursing board
on whether it is within the scope of practice of
a nurse anesthetist to administer certain pain management
procedures.
Specifically, the opinion allows a nurse anesthetist
“to perform procedures under the direction
and supervision of the physician involving the injection
of local anesthetics, steroids and analgesics for
pain management purposes, peripheral nerve blocks,
epidural injections, and spinal facet joint injections
when the CRNA can document education, training and
experience in performing such procedures and has
the knowledge, skills, and abilities to safely perform
the procedures based on an order from the physician….”
Disagreeing with the breadth of the opinion, the
Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners issued
its own Advisory Opinion to clarify that the procedures
described above constitute the practice of medicine
“when used for interventional pain management
of patients suffering from chronic pain” and
may only be performed by a physician. The Opinion
continues to state that while a “nurse anesthetist
may utilize these procedures on the prescription
of and under physician direction and supervision
for surgical cases and acute pain associated
with surgery [emphasis added]….it
is beyond the scope of practice of CRNAs to employ
them to diagnose, manage or treat chronic pain patients.
To do so would permit the CRNA to exercise independent
medical judgment, perform diagnostic testing, render
diagnoses, and provide treatment or recommendations
for treatment of patients suffering with chronic
pain.” The Opinion further states that such
determinations are reserved solely to physicians
and are not “delegable to a non-physician
by physician prescription, direction or supervision.”
The Spine Diagnostic Center of Baton Rouge (“The
Center”) brought a lawsuit that seeks a preliminary
injunction against the nurse anesthetist from continuing
pain management procedures. The lawsuit also seeks
a declaratory statement that “pain management
procedures” constitute the practice of medicine
and that the nursing board exceeded its authority
in authorizing nurse anesthetists to practice these
procedures. A complaint was also filed with the
medical board against the nurse anesthetist for
unauthorized practice of medicine. The Center also
petitioned the nursing board to repeal or amend
its ruling.
While the judge denied the preliminary injunction
against the nurse anesthetist in her May 10 order,
the ruling is significant in that it affirms that
the practice of medicine is administered by the
medical board. Issuing an advisory opinion is within
the purview of the nursing board. The judge, however,
concludes that a nursing board’s advisory
opinion cannot override the authority of a medical
board to administer the scope of practice of medicine.
The judgment continues to state that “the
practice of medicine is statutorily defined and
it is administered by the State Board of Medicine.
Nothing in the Advisory Opinion of the State Board
of Nursing detracts from that authority.”
It could be concluded from the ruling that the medical
board’s Advisory Opinion overrides any advisory
opinion issued by the nursing board that authorizes
a nurse anesthetist to perform interventional pain
management procedures for patients suffering from
chronic pain. Such procedures are reserved solely
to physicians and cannot be delegated.
The ruling on the injunction specifically finds
that the nursing board merely issued an opinion
rather than a rule. The Spine Diagnostic Center
has appealed that portion of the ruling. The
Center contends that the “opinion” in
effect constitutes a rule. Louisiana statutory
law, however, requires nursing scope-of-practice
issues to be established only in an administrative
rule in accordance with specific rule-making procedures
under the Louisiana Administrative Procedures
Act (LAPA). The Center contends that the nursing
board circumvented this process by establishing
scope of practice of a nurse anesthetist via an
advisory opinion, without following rule-making
procedures required by LAPA. Therefore the
appeal seeks an injunction and retraction of the
advisory opinion.
|