|
|
|
| |
October 2007
Volume 71 |
Number 10
|
|
|
GAO Confirms Huge Medicare Conversion
Factor Disparity for Anesthesiology
Ronald Szabat, J.D., LL.M.
Executive Vice-President – External Affairs
and General Counsel
n a long-expected study, recently completed and
released, the federal government’s General
Accountability Office (GAO) has independently verified
what ASA members have long known. Payments under
Medicare for anesthesiology services are disproportionately
lower than private payer “reimbursement”
for comparable services. All told, and based on
its methodology as discussed below, GAO says that
Medicare anesthesia payments are 67 percent lower
than average commercial payments.
Since the inception of Medicare’s resource-based
relative value payment system, ASA has made the
case that anesthesiology has been significantly
undervalued and underpaid. ASA’s own biennial
surveys have shown that Medicare payment for anesthesiologists
is a mere fraction of what private insurance companies
pay. And ASA advocacy efforts, both on the regulatory
and legislative sides, have consistently made the
case that the Medicare anesthesia conversion factor
dramatically lags that of the private sector.
In support of gaining independent data to help Congress
and the Administration, several years ago Rep. Fortney
“Pete” Stark (D-CA), now chair of the
House Ways and Means Health Subcommittee, and former
Representative and Chairwoman Nancy Johnson (R-CT)
asked GAO to take a hard look at government payments
for Medicare anesthesia services. In asking GAO
for a comprehensive study, Reps. Stark and Johnson
expressed concern that the difference between Medicare
and private anesthesia payments could create regional
discrepancies in the supply of anesthesiologists,
and they asked GAO to explore the issue in depth.
Specifically, GAO was asked to study the extent
to which Medicare payments for anesthesia services
were lower than private payments across Medicare
payment localities in 2004 and whether or not the
supply of anesthesia practitioners across Medicare
payment localities at that time was related to the
differences between Medicare and private payments
for anesthesia services, or to the concentration
of Medicare beneficiaries in these localities.
In a far-ranging report that admittedly used claims
data from only two large anesthesia service billing
companies for seven principal anesthesia services
in 41 Medicare payment localities, GAO nonetheless
reached conclusions verifying a huge payment disparity.
As included in the report, “[for] 2004, average
Medicare payments for the seven anesthesia services
ranged from $177 to $303 across the 41 payment localities,
a range of 71 percent.” At the same time,
GAO concludes that “average private payments
for the same set of seven anesthesia services …
ranged from $472 to over $1,300 across these localities,
a range of 177 percent (emphasis added).”
Not surprisingly, GAO also found that the number
of anesthesiologists decreased as the concentration
of Medicare beneficiaries increased in 87 payment
localities. This fact alone gives new teeth to arguments
long made by ASA and other national medical specialty
organizations that the comparatively lower rates
of Medicare payment, now coupled with annual threats
of sustainable growth rate payment cuts, are a severe
disincentive for physicians to practice in areas
with a high concentration of Medicare beneficiaries.
Despite repeated attempts by ASA to supply data
and assist GAO in its efforts, the report specifically
did not review hospital stipend levels, thus failing
to study any correlation between anesthesiologist
supply and Medicare beneficiary numbers —
a possible marker of cost-shifting to cover Medicare
physician payment shortfalls. ASA believes this
was a major missed opportunity by GAO to highlight
another indicator of Medicare payment problems.
All told and despite its methodological limitations,
the GAO report is useful in making the case for
legislative and regulatory reform for anesthesiology
payments. Along these lines, ASA’s own landmark
work through the American Medical Association’s
(AMA’s) Relative Value Update Committee should
produce significant relief as Medicare considers
thousands of comments from ASA members in support
of an increase in the Medicare anesthesia conversion
factor for 2008. Stay tuned for more on that in
the coming months.
For a copy of the entire GAO report, please visit
www.ASAhq.org/news/GAOreport.pdf.
| |
|
Ronald Szabat, J.D., LL.M., is ASA Executive
Vice-President — External Affairs and
General Counsel, managing its Washington, D.C.,
office. |
|
return to top |
|
|
|
|
|