he
Ontario SARS report on the severe acute respiratory
syndrome-coronavirus (SARS-CoV) epidemic in Toronto
in 2003 provides an ominous preview of an anticipated
influenza A pandemic. Many health care workers (HCWs),
including at least one anesthesiologist, became
ill and died from SARS. Initially, the N95 respirator,
known commonly as the TB mask, was not thought to
be necessary. The SARS Report promotes “The
Precautionary Principle,” wherein
“action to reduce risk should not await scientific
certainty” in situations of potentially grave
consequence. The SARS Report also advises that infection
control and health care professionals’ safety
should be handled as one instead of as separate
entities.1
A pandemic influenza virus could arise out of the
co-mingling of H5N1 avian influenza and a seasonal
influenza A genetic material. The Centers for Disease
Control (CDC) infection control precautions for
pandemic influenza are the same as those for SARS.2,3
The modes of transmission of SARS
and influenza A are by direct and indirect (fomite)
contact, by droplet and, most probably, by short-range
airborne aerosol, which arises during aerosol-generating
procedures. Procedures that generate aerosol
include high-flow oxygen delivery, aerosolized or
nebulized medication administration, diagnostic
sputum induction, bronchoscopy, airway suctioning,
endotracheal intubation and extubation, bag-mask
positive-pressure ventilation, noninvasive ventilatory
methods (e.g., BiPAP, CPAP) and high-frequency oscillatory
ventilation.2,3,4
Spontaneous coughing and sneezing also generate
aerosol.5
The CDC provides a highly informative review of
transmission modes, masks and respirators.3
The N95 respirator is the minimum respiratory
protection mandated by the CDC and Occupational
Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) when the
health care provider is in close contact with patients
with the highly pathogenic respiratory illnesses
of SARS or pandemic or avian influenza. Both the
CDC and OSHA advise that additional respiratory
precautions are warranted (but not mandated) for
health care personnel performing aerosol-generating
procedures on victims of these diseases.3,4
Under test conditions, the N95 inhibits passage
of 95 percent of 0.3 micron saline particles. In
clinical settings, the optimal level of protection
will hold only if the wearer has been successfully
fit-tested and if no leakage around the edges occurs
at any time during patient care. The N95 increases
the work of breathing, making it uncomfortable to
wear for extended periods, and it is likely to be
adjusted, displaced or periodically lifted. Fit-testing
requires trained personnel, specialized equipment
and substantial time per subject to complete. Facial
hair or facial structure may preclude a satisfactory
fit test. The reuse of N95 respirators is discouraged
but may be necessary if supplies are insufficient
for single use.2,3,4
The powered air purifying respirator (PAPR)
is a nondisposable full hood or enclosed face cover
system that provides a higher level of respiratory
protection than the N95 respirator.2,3,4
Some of the manufacturers are 3M, Bullard, MSA and
North Safety. A blower worn on a waist belt draws
air through a high-efficiency particulate air filter.
The filtered air passes through a corrugated tube
into the hood and prevents — contaminated
air from entering. PAPRs for chemical protection
contain an absorbent cartridge, and the hood is
made of a chemical-resistant material.
In addition to providing a higher level of respiratory
protection than the N95, further advantages of the
PAPR are that it does not require fit-testing, is
more comfortable to wear for an extended period,
and provides contact protection for the entire head,
neck and shoulders when the full hood style is chosen.
Disadvantages of the PAPR are that it requires initial
and periodic training and practice, is nondisposable,
is expensive, requires a regular maintenance program,
is not autoclavable, requires cleaning after use,
may contain latex, and the blower noise may impede
communication.3,4
Addendum
Two different hoods are available
for the PAPR. The first covers the face,
chin, and top of the head, and has air
exit holes beneath the chin. A size
small sample face cover hood, admittedly
too small for the testers, was tried
by the author’s associates. It
was noticed that when inhaling deeply,
the outward airflow through the exit
holes could be interrupted, suggesting
that ambient air could be inhaled through
the holes when a deep breath is taken
by the wearer. The second type of hood
covers the entire head and shoulders
and has no exit holes. It has a 100
fold higher protection factor than the
face hood. The cost of the hoods is
$20 for the face cover hood and $25
for the full hood. The hoods are non-disposable
but are intended for a single user. |
|
The University of Wisconsin Hospital requires
use of PAPRs for aerosol-generating procedures as
does the California State Pandemic Influenza Preparedness
and Response Plan.6
Other state, local and hospital pandemic influenza
plans may not. PAPRs will be in extremely short
supply once a pandemic starts. N95 supplies may
also be very limited unless hospitals have stocked
beyond the usual “just in time” supply.
Upon request through the regional 3M sales representative
and the 3M Occupational Safety Division, the 3M
company can provide education and training assistance
with PAPRs and N95s.7
The OSHA Pandemic Influenza document is
concise, eminently readable and very helpful.4
It can be obtained in booklet form by calling your
region’s OSHA office listed at the end of
the online document. It includes synopses of background
information, infection control issues, personal
protective equipment (PPE), a description of masks
and respirators, Internet resources for diagnosis
and treatment, and planning checklists. For all
industrial and medical respiratory protection systems,
OSHA requires that PPE be used within a context
of a respiratory protection program, which includes
a written protocol, medical clearance of the PPE
wearer, training and at least yearly practice.4
3M has developed an OSHA-compliant respiratory PPE
medical clearance form (www.respexam.com)
and a record-keeping system.7
Contact precautions for SARS/pandemic/avian
influenza include gown, gloves, hat, foot covers,
close-fitting goggles and a face shield if the N95
is used.2,4,6
Both the chosen PPE, whether N95 or PAPR, and the
unprotected skin can be contaminated by droplets
and aerosols, thus providing a fomite from which
the individual may self-inoculate by transferring
the infectious agent by hand to the eyes, nose or
mouth. It is advisable therefore to cover all exposed
skin wherever possible and observe strict hand hygiene
following removal of the PPE.
Contamination of exposed skin occurred more often
with N95, but breeches in don/doff sequence were
more frequent with PAPR.8,9
Training and practice in the don/doff sequence
and in performing procedures while wearing a PAPR
are extremely important aspects of provider and
patient safety. The PAPR don/doff sequence
involves an assistant or buddy to remove the belt
that supports the blower and filter and a re-gloving
to remove part of the contact PPE.9
The OSHA General Duty Clause mandates that
the employer is responsible for providing a safe
work environment. For many anesthesiologists, the
medical group we belong to is our employer, as opposed
to the hospital. Therefore, we ourselves, not the
hospital, may be accountable for our colleagues’
and our own safety or failure to provide for that
safety. Further, ethical concepts, in addition to
OSHA, suggest that the employer may not demand that
the employee report for work when available safety
protection is not provided.4
In contrast to “just in time” PPE training,
OSHA implies that if PPE is likely to be needed
when performing a procedure common to a specialty,
then that specialist is obligated to become familiar
and facile with the use of the PPE in advance of
the anticipated need.4
Anesthesiology departments are advised to
prepare for managing SARS and pandemic
influenza patients by:
1. Contacting your infection control nurse and
the hospital emergency preparedness or disaster
committee. Inquire about SARS/pandemic influenza
plans, especially the choice between N95 or PAPR
for respiratory PPE during intubation and other
aerosol-generating procedures. Chances are that
you will need to take leadership in physician
preparedness for pandemic influenza and other
all-hazard events.
2. Contacting critical care physicians, hospitalists,
pulmonary specialists and emergency medicine physicians
to develop a consensus regarding preparation and
PPE for SARS/pandemic influenza.
3. Being aware that physicians are often not hospital
employees. You may ask the hospital to budget
for PAPRs, but you may in fact need to buy and
maintain them yourself and conduct training.
4. Contacting the PAPR manufacturer of your choice
for product information and training assistance.
3M is a leader in this area.
5. Obtaining PPE equipment, conduct training and
practice until proficient in the PPE don/doff
sequence. Perform procedures while wearing PPE.
Initiate or join a hospital OSHA Respiratory Protection
Program.
6. Becoming familiar with the OSHA pandemic influenza
document.4
OSHA also has publications on emergency preparedness
and on guidelines for hospital-based first receivers
of victims of hazardous materials exposure.
7. Writing a section for your anesthesia department
policy and procedure manual on intubating pandemic
influenza/SARS patients. The Joint Commission
has greatly expanded its emergency preparedness
requirements.
8. Refering to the ASA Committee on Trauma and
Emergency Preparedness “Statement on Pandemic
Influenza Preparedness” posted online at
www.ASAhq.org/clinical/PandemicDocument.pdf
in December 2006.10
In summary, respiratory and contact PPE are needed
for SARS/avian influenza/pandemic influenza. In
addition to full-contact protection of the head
and neck, the PAPR offers a higher level of respiratory
protection than the N95 respirator. The CDC and
OSHA suggest, but do not mandate, use of the PAPR
for aerosol-generating procedures. Regardless of
which PPE system is used, following correct protocol
and performing procedures while wearing PPE will
reduce health care provider infection and increase
patient safety.
References:
1. Initial Report of the Ontario Expert Panel on
SARS and Infectious Disease Control www.health.gov.on.ca/english/public/pub/ministry_reports/walker_panel_2003/walker_panel.html.
Accessed on November 21, 2007.
2. The Centers for Disease Control: Public Health
Guidance for Community-Level Preparedness and Response
to Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) Version
2, Supplement I: Infection Control in Healthcare,
Home, and Community Settings, III. Infection Control
in Healthcare Facilities, May 3, 2006 www.cdc.gov/ncidod/sars/guidance/I/healthcare.htm#3d1.
Accessed on November 27, 2007.
3. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
Interim Guidance on Planning for the Use of Surgical
Masks and Respirators in Health Care Settings During
an Influenza Pandemic, October 2006. www.pandemicflu.gov/plan/healthcare/maskguidancehc.html#appB.
Accessed on November 27, 2007.
4. Pandemic Influenza Preparedness and Response
Guidelines for Healthcare Workers and Healthcare
Employers, OSHA 3328-05 2007. www.osha.gov/Publications/OSHA_pandemic_health.pdf.
Accessed on November 27, 2007.
5. Tellier R. Review of aerosol transmission of
influenza A virus. Emerg Infect Dis.(serial
on Internet) 2006; 12 (11). www.cdc.gov/ncidod/EID/vol12no11/06-0426.htm.
6. California Influenza Preparedness and Response
Plan, September 8 2006. www.dhs.ca.gov/ps/dcdc/izgroup/pdf/pandemic.pdf.
Accessed on November 27, 2007
7. Personal Communication, November 28, 2007, with
permission: Jim Brachmann, Homeland Security Specialist,
3M Occupational Health & Environmental Safety
Division. (Office) (815) 477-1342; (Cell) (815)
341-3253; (Fax) 815-477-0385; jfbrachmann1@mmm.com;
www.pandemicpreparation.com.
8. Zamora JE, Murdoch J, Simchison B, Day AG. Contamination:
A comparison of 2 personal protective systems. CMAJ.
2006; 175:249-254. And editorial: Conly JM. Personal
protective equipment for preventing respiratory
infections: What have we really learned? CMAJ. 2006;
175(3):263.
9. Minnesota Department of Health: Full Barrier
Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) with Powered
Air Purifying Respirator (PAPR), Donning and doffing
of PPD when using a PAPR. www.health.state.mn.us/divs/idepc/dtopics/infectioncontrol/ppe/ppepapr.html.
Accessed on November 21, 2007.
10. Tompkins BM, Antoine J, Stackhouse R, Barach
P, Katz J. The ASA Committee on Trauma and Emergency
Preparedness Statement on Pandemic Influenza Preparedness.
www.ASAhq.org/clinical/PandemicDocument.pdf.
| |
|
Bonnie
M. Tompkins, M.D., is Clinical Assistant Professor
of Anesthesiology, (retired from clinical practice),
University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and
Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin. |
|
| |
|
Jill
A. Antoine, M.D., is Associate Clinical Professor
of Anesthesiology, University of California
at San Francisco, San Francisco, California. |
|
|