| |
Douglas R. Bacon, M.D., Editor
|
|
To Serve Them All My Days
s
a first-year medical student struggling with the intellectual
load of classes, labs and exams, I had one guilty
pleasure. Each Sunday night on PBS there was a terrific
miniseries titled “To Serve Them All My Days.”
An adaptation of R.F. Delderfield’s novel, the
storyline was that of a Welsh miner’s son, David
Powlett-Jones, who had been field-promoted to the
officer corps in the British Imperial Army in World
War I. Among his fellow officers, drawn exclusively
from the aristocracy before the war, Powlett-Jones
is looked down upon as being somehow unworthy and
only in his position because of the horrific casualties
and the inevitable lack of male offspring of the peers
of the realm.
Powlett-Jones’ combat experiences leave him
“shell shocked.” Seeking employment after
his military service, he was accepted as a teacher
at Bamfylde, an elite private boarding school in West
Devon. While not possessing a university degree, Polwett-Jones
becomes one of the beloved teachers at the school.
The series tracked his career from a fragile solder
to the position of headmaster during the two decades
between world wars.
Although now available on DVD, I have not watched
it since the original broadcast. My memory has most
likely romanticized certain parts, but the internal
struggle to transform from an officer to a civilian,
coupled with the memories of trench warfare, remains
vivid. The lead character flirts with communism and
realizes that he must prepare his students, as the
1930s progress, for another inevitable war. Throughout
the series, he rails against the romantic notion of
war as noble and notes the sacrifice made by the men
of his generation.
More germane to anesthesiology, however, is the notion
of service. Powlett-Jones dedicates his life to the
students and to Bamfylde. It is the day-to-day caring
for individuals — in the miniseries, the students,
and, in professional terms, our patients. We need
to take a moment to stop and consider our level of
commitment. As physicians first and anesthesiologists
second, there is an obligation to the patient that
forms the core of our professional being. Stuart C.
Cullen, M.D., writing in Anesthesiology in 1960 may
have hit on the essence of what this means when he
wrote:
[An anesthesiologist] who appl(ies) the basic
principles of good medical practice... has no difficulty
in identifying himself with the patient… before,
during and after an anesthetic procedure. This is
the physician who realizes that even though he may
not have sole responsibility for the care of the
patient, he is obligated to contribute everything
he can to the patient’s welfare. This is the
physician who recognizes that all therapy, including
his, is designed to benefit the patient… the
privilege of treating a patient can be earned only
by consistent and assiduous demonstration of his
professional skills day after day to individual
patients and individual colleagues.1
Dr. Cullen’s image of service to the patient
and equally to colleagues — be they surgeons,
operating room staff, nurses, nurse anesthetists or
anesthesiologist assistants — remains a most
vivid image. This is the very core of what it means
to be an anesthesiologist.
Within the pages of this ASA NEWSLETTER,
one form of service to both nation and patient is
well defined. Military anesthesiologists have once
again stepped into the chaos of war and found ways
to better treat their patients. Read with pride how
the difficulties of transporting critically wounded
men and women were overcome. What anesthesiologist,
pain specialist or critical care physician would have
thought about the issues of automated infusion devices
functioning at 30,000 feet? Who among us would have
considered transporting critically injured and ill
individuals halfway across the world?
Solving these impediments has allowed the wounded
to get out of an unsafe environment and be cared for
at a facility better able to accommodate their needs.
But the individual anesthesiologists have served their
patients well by being dedicated to one of the pillars
of professionalism, the best interests of the patients.
Like Powlett-Jones, they are serving with a dedication
that goes beyond the ordinary and is an example that
we should emulate.
There is, though, another side to military anesthesia
often overlooked because of the strong attitudes and
personal feelings surrounding the armed forces. Anesthesiologists
in the armed services have been going out regularly
to Third World countries on medical missions. Residents
in the military look forward to this experience, as
does the attending staff. It is a chance to provide
anesthesia services in an austere environment, a chance
to sharpen problem-solving skills and learn to give
anesthetics without all the trappings of a tertiary
care medical center. Lessons learned here translate
to better care on the battlefield — but it also
allows these military physicians to answer the call
to provide health care to those in need.
Early in Operation Iraqi Freedom, Brian P. McGlinch,
M.D., ASA director from Minnesota and an activated
reservist, spoke to the Board of Directors about his
experience at Walter Reed Army Medical Center. He
spoke with passion about the soldiers and Marines
he had cared for and to whom he had become attached.
Transferred from Germany, many of these casualties
were less than a week away from the sand of the Middle
East. Clearly, Dr. McGlinch, like so many of the physicians
working in and for the military, was moved beyond
patriotism, beyond the traditional physician-patient
relationship, to serve these brave people. Each author
in this NEWSLETTER has that motivation.
The ASA House of Delegates approved a resolution to
help those reservists maintain their active memberships
while serving on active duty. It is a small reduction
in dues, but in an instance of increased financial
pressure on the activated reservist, it is a welcome
relief. It is a small way our Society could help its
members caring for those who are fighting on our behalf.
It is another way ASA continues to serve its members
— even a small minority doing very important
work.
We, as ASA, have another opportunity to serve our
brave men and women fighting for and maintaining our
freedoms here at home. We need to make our voice heard
in Washington, D.C. concerning issues related to the
health care of the troops and our veterans. How a
society treats those who are vulnerable speaks to
its greatness. As a Society, we have spent millions
of dollars and countless hours working political issues
to the benefit of anesthesiologists. These endeavors
are critical to the survival of our specialty —
economically as well as politically. It is service
well rendered by those charged with these duties.
Yet, personally, I would like to see us engage in
another lobbying effort. The popular press is full
of stories about returning veterans and their care,
both physical and mental. The VA, which has done groundbreaking
work on electronic medical records and health maintenance,
needs additional resources to adjust to the demands
of returning veterans. The needs of these young people
are not the needs of the World War II generation,
nor of the Korean and Vietnam vets, and there is need
for flexibility within the monolithic system to adjust
to the new demands these veterans are placing on the
system. If we, as ASA, were to add in a talking point
about improving veterans’ care during our annual
trek to Capitol Hill this spring, would it not be
the height of service to those who have given so much
for us? And for one moment, we would not be talking
about anything that directly benefitted anesthesiologists
— just patients whom we decided to serve so
long ago when we accepted the invitation to go to
medical school.
David Powlett-Jones winds up serving the students
of Bamfylde all his days. As physicians first, and
anesthesiologists second, we serve our patients each
and every day of our careers. Even when retired, many
ASA members continue their tradition of service, always
ready to come to the aid of those in need. Our military
component has placed a new standard for service before
us. We, as a professional Society and individuals,
need to look to the next anesthetic as a service opportunity.
To give our best each and every day, serving our patients
and the staff around us, is the mark of a professional.
To set our sights on the good of the specialty as
a whole, and health care globally, goes beyond the
simple definitions of professionalism. To make the
effort to change health care delivery in a meaningful
way will leave a lasting mark upon history. We are
at a juncture where it is possible to change elements
of health care and leave evidence for posterity that
we were professionals first who were able to disengage
self-interest for the greater good.
What will you do? Are you willing to take up the examples
of our military colleagues and the fictional David
Powlett-Jones?
— D.R.B.
Reference:
1. Cullen SC. Attitudes and practices. Anesthesiology.
1960; 21(3):322-323.
return to top
|