erioperative
fluid therapy is one of the most controversial topics
in perioperative care.1
Recent studies suggest that fluid minimization strategies
(or at least avoidance of fluid overload) in patients
undergoing elective major surgical procedures, particularly
abdominal procedures, reduce perioperative complications
and improve postoperative outcome.1-3
Intraoperative fluid overload may be avoided by
eliminating the use of predetermined algorithms
that emphasize replacement of evaporative losses,
third-space losses and losses through diuresis as
well as eliminating preloading for neuraxial analgesia.2
In addition, blood loss may be replaced with colloid
on a volume-to-volume basis rather than by crystalloids.2
Furthermore, avoidance of deep general anesthesia
may prevent the higher fluid administration required
to maintain adequate hemodynamics.
One of the major concerns with intraoperative fluid
minimization (or restriction) is potential unrecognized
(or subclinical) hypovolemia resulting in organ
dysfunction, particularly postoperative acute renal
failure, which may increase the length of hospital
stay, postoperative mortality and health care costs.4-6
Intraoperative urine output, which is thought to
be the clinical manifestation of renal blood flow,
is commonly used as an indicator of intravascular
volume status and to guide fluid therapy. Most guidelines
recommend that urine output of more than 0.5 ml/kg/h
should be maintained, intraoperatively. However,
the evidence for this recommendation is questionable.
Thus, the relationship between urine output and
fluid administration in the intraoperative period
remains controversial.7
Inhaled anesthetics markedly reduce urine output;
therefore, fluid administration based on urine output
can lead to fluid overload.8,9
Surgical stress response and associated sympathetic
stimulation; activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone
system; renal cortical vasoconstriction; increased
antidiuretic hormone; and reduced cardiac output
as well as mechanical compression of renal vessels
and parenchyma (e.g., during pneumoperitoneum) can
also result in oliguria. Overall, oliguria (defined
as urine output <0.5mL/kg/h) is not a sensitive
marker and does not always indicate impending renal
failure.10,11
There is no evidence that renal function deteriorates
with reduced urine output.12
Furthermore, liberal fluid administration has not
been shown to reduce the incidence of acute renal
failure.
Kheterpal et al.5
recently examined the risk factors for postoperative
acute renal failure after major noncardiac surgery
in patients with normal preoperative renal function.
The authors found that age, body mass index, liver
disease, peripheral vascular occlusive disease,
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease requiring
chronic bronchodilator therapy, high-risk surgery,
and emergent surgery were independent predictors
of postoperative acute renal failure. In addition,
intraoperative factors such as total vasopressor
dose, vasopressor infusion, and diuretic administration
impact the occurrence of postoperative acute renal
failure.5
Because of the concerns of fluid minimization strategies,
many investigators have proposed goal-directed fluid
administration using dynamic (flow-related) hemodynamic
variables such as stroke volume.13-15
It is suggested that goal-directed fluid therapy
may allow individualized fluid therapy that adapts
to changing patient needs during the perioperative
period and prevents subtle hypovolemia or hypervolemia.
Goal-directed therapy uses the concept of fluid
challenge to optimize the predetermined goal.
A systematic review of the literature found that
intraoperative goal-directed fluid therapy with
maximization of flow-related hemodynamic variables
reduced perioperative complications, including postoperative
nausea and vomiting, facilitated gastrointestinal
functional recovery and reduced hospital stay.13
Another systematic review by Abbas and Hill14
reported that the use of an esophageal Doppler device
for monitoring and optimization of flow-related
hemodynamic variables improved short-term outcomes
in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery.
A systematic review conducted by the Agency for
Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) at the request
of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
(CMS) also found that fluid therapy guided by esophageal
Doppler monitoring provided clinically significant
reduction in minor and major postoperative complications
as well as length of hospital stay.15
Based on this report, CMS has determined that esophageal
Doppler monitoring of cardiac output for ventilated
patients in the intensive care unit and operative
patients with the need for intraoperative fluid
optimization is reasonable and necessary, particularly
in patients undergoing major surgical procedures
with substantial blood loss or fluid shifts; thus,
allowing physicians to charge for the appropriate
use of the esophageal Doppler device.
Interestingly, in contrast to the fluid minimization
studies, goal-directed therapy led to administration
of larger amount of fluids compared to the control
group.13,14
With respect to the type of fluids (i.e., crystalloids
versus colloids), most studies evaluating fluid
minimization or goal-directed therapy used colloid
solutions, with most of the volume administered
early in the surgical period. Nevertheless, a balanced
approach to choice of fluid may be more prudent.
Other functional (dynamic) hemodynamic monitors
that have been considered for goal-directed fluid
therapy include arterial wave analysis (e.g., pulse
contour, pulse power analysis, and non-invasive
finger pressure). In addition, variations in pulse-pressure,
systolic blood pressure or stroke volume induced
by mechanical ventilation can also be considered
as predictors of fluid responsiveness. However,
these monitors have not been adequately studied
and need further investigation before they can be
recommended to guide fluid therapy.
In summary, current perioperative fluid therapy
is based upon dogma and personal beliefs. Anesthesiologists
are desensitized to administration of large fluid
volumes, particularly crystalloids, which can result
in fluid overload and increase perioperative complications.
Similar to any other drug administered in the perioperative
period, crystalloids should be administered judiciously.
Simple intraoperative maneuvers such as avoidance
of deep anesthesia, large tidal volumes and algorithms
to replace fluids is critical in avoiding fluid
overload. Furthermore, it is imperative that we
make every effort to reduce preoperative dehydration
by encouraging oral fluids until two hours prior
to surgery. It must be emphasized that fluid therapy
in the immediate postoperative period is as critical
as during the intraoperative period. However, few
studies have evaluated this area.
Individualized goal-directed fluid optimization
facilitates early recovery and reduces hospital
stay. In addition, it is imperative that protocols
for accelerated (or fast-track) postoperative rehabilitation
programs are also implemented. For example, a fast-track
rehabilitation for a major abdominal surgical procedure
would consist of avoidance of bowel preparation
and postoperative nasogastric tube as well as early
aggressive oral therapy and ambulation. It is possible
that emphasis on postoperative weight control and
fast-track rehabilitation will further influence
postoperative outcome. Future studies are necessary
to address these issues.
References:
1. Joshi GP. Intraoperative fluid restriction improves
outcome after major elective gastrointestinal surgery.
Anesth Analg. 2006; 101:601-605.
2. Brandstrup B. Fluid therapy for the surgical
patient. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol.
2006; 20:265-283.
3. Lobo DN, Macafee DAL, Allison SP. How perioperative
fluid balance influences postoperative outcome.
Best Prac Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2006;
20:439-455.
4. Chertow GM, Burdick E, Honour M, Bonventre JV,
Bates DW. Acute kidney injury, mortality, length
of stay, and costs in hospitalized patients. J
Am Soc Nephrol. 2005; 16:3365-3370.
5. Kheterpal S, Tremper KK, Englesbe MJ, et al.
Predictors of postoperative acute renal failure
after noncardiac surgery in patients with previously
normal renal function. Anesthesiology.
2007; 107:892-902.
6. Sear JW. Kidney dysfunction in the postoperative
period. Br J Anaesth. 2005; 95:20-32.
7. Holte K, Kehlet H. Fluid therapy and surgical
outcomes in elective surgery: A need for reassessment
in fast-track surgery. J Am Coll Surg.
2006; 202:971-989.
8. Brauer KI, Svensen C, Hahn RG, Traber LD, Prough
DS. Volume kinetic analysis of the distribution
of 0.9% saline in conscious versus isoflurane-anesthetized
sheep. Anesthesiology. 2002; 96:442-449.
9. Connolly CM, Kramer GC, Hahn RG, et al. Isoflurane
but not mechanical ventilation promotes extravascular
fluid accumulation during crystalloid volume loading.
Anesthesiology. 2003; 98:670-681.
10. Bellomo R, Ronco C, Kellum JA, et al. Acute
renal failure - definition, outcome measures, animal
models, fluid therapy and information technology
needs: The Second International Consensus Conference
of the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI)
Group. Critical Care. 2004; 8:R202-212.
11. Moitra V, Diaz G, Sladen RN. Monitoring hepatic
and renal function. Anesthesiol Clin N Am.
2006; 24:847-880.
12. Desborough JP. The stress response to trauma
and surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2000; 85:109-117.
13. Bundgaard-Nielsen M, Holte K, Secher NH, Kehlet
H. Monitoring of perioperative fluid administration
by individualized goal-directed therapy. Acta
Anaesthesiol Scand. 2007; 51:331-340.
14. Abbas SM, Hill AG. Systematic review of literature
for the use of esophageal Doppler monitor for fluid
replacement in major abdominal surgery. Anaesthesia.
2008; 63:44-51.
15. Esophageal Doppler ultrasound-based cardiac
output monitoring for real-time therapeutic management
of hospitalized patients. A review. Agency for Healthcare
Research and Quality Technology Assessment. January
16, 2007. www.cms.hhs.gov/mcd/viewtechassess.asp?from2=viewtechassess.asp&where=index&tid=45&].
Accessed on February 21, 2008.
| |
|
Ana
Crawford, M.D., is a CA-3 Resident in Anesthesiology,
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center,
Dallas. |
|
| |
|
Girish
P. Joshi, M.D., F.F.A.R.C.S.I., is Professor
of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, and Director,
Perioperative Medicine and Ambulatory Anesthesia,
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center,
Dallas. |
|
|