Dear Colleagues:
We want to make you aware of an element in the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) proposed rule for the 2010 Physician Fee Schedule which will affect your pain practice.
CMS is proposing to reduce the values for specific pain services, including spinal pumps and stimulators. The RUC reviewed these codes in 2008, and CMS implemented reduced values for these services effective Jan. 1, 2009. Now, CMS is proposing to reduce the values even further using a suspect methodology, widely-rejected by other groups including ASA, AMA and other pain societies.
Please take action against this harmful proposal by submitting a comment letter to CMS. Comment letters must be received by August 31, 2009—just 10 days from today. Please don’t delay in submitting your comments.
ASA will address this issue in its comment letter to CMS, but is important that the Agency hear from you—the physician—representing the patients who need these services.
Please note:
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
Department of Health and Human Services
Attention: CMS-1413-P
P.O. Box 8013
Baltimore, MD 21244-8013
Sincerely,
Roger A. Moore, M.D.
President
Comment Letter
RE: AMA RUC Review of Potentially Misvalued Codes – Site of Service Anomalies
I am writing to express my grave concerns about CMS’ proposal to further reduce the values of CPT codes associated with spinal pumps and stimulators, CMS-1413-P. I strongly urge CMS to maintain the current values, which were recommended by the RUC in 2008 and implemented by CMS in 2009. Further reduction in these values would:
Furthermore, the methodology CMS used to arrive at these values is so flawed that it results in negative values for some of the services to which it was applied. CMS itself acknowledges this weakness when it suggests maintaining current values for those codes for which the methodology results in negative values. It is essential that the Fee Schedule be based on methodologies that are statistically valid and can be consistently applied. This is clearly not the case in this instance.
I urge CMS to maintain the existing values for these codes for the 2010 Physician Fee Schedule.